Unbound MEDLINE

Esthetic refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. [Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg] Journal article

 
TitleEsthetic refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction.
Author(s)Quatela VC, Sherris DA, Rounds MF 
InstitutionDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
SourceArch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995 Oct; 121(10):1106-13.
MeSHAged
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Carcinoma, Basal Cell
Cartilage
Dermabrasion
Esthetics
Female
Forehead
Humans
Injections, Intradermal
Male
Middle Aged
Nose
Nose Neoplasms
Patient Satisfaction
Reoperation
Respiration
Rhinoplasty
Skin Transplantation
Surgical Flaps
Tissue Expansion
Treatment Outcome
Triamcinolone Acetonide
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To identify refinements in forehead flap nasal reconstruction that consistently provide better esthetic and functional results.
DESIGN: Case series of patients undergoing forehead flap nasal reconstruction from July 1, 1987, to May 31, 1994.
SETTING: University hospital ambulatory surgery department.
PATIENTS: Thirty-two patients with various nasal defects.
INTERVENTIONS: Modifications of currently accepted techniques of paramedian forehead flap nasal reconstruction, namely, flap harvest and contouring, W-plasty closure of the superior forehead donor site, and creation of soft-tissue triangles. The principles of open-structure rhinoplasty are incorporated into cartilaginous reconstruction of the nasal tip and columella. The alar rim is reconstructed with cartilage grafts placed at the nasal rim.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Esthetic and functional results of nasal reconstruction were subjectively graded by three otolaryngologists (V.C.Q., D.A.S., and M.F.R.) and the patients.
RESULTS: Improved esthetic and functional nasal reconstruction. The most common nasal subunits reconstructed were as follows: ala, 27 patients (84%); side-wall, 22 patients (69%); dorsum, 18 patients (56%), and tip, 15 patients (47%). The esthetic results ranged from average to excellent (3 to 5 on a scale of 5), the functional results ranged from improved to much improved over preoperative breathing (4 to 5). Two patients required unplanned surgical revisions. Forty-seven percent of patients chose to undergo dermabrasion. Five patients required postoperative intradermal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog). Three patients required preoperative tissue expansion. Flap or graft loss, infection, or hematoma did not occur.
CONCLUSIONS: The predictability of the techniques in providing excellent results in patients undergoing nasal reconstruction decreases the need for revision procedures and helps the patient and the surgeon achieve the desired outcome.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Case Reports
Journal Article
PubMed ID7546577
  
Advertise on this site.