| Title | Laceration repair using a tissue adhesive in a children's emergency department. | | Author(s) | Bruns TB, Simon HK, McLario DJ, Sullivan KM, Wood RJ, Anand KJ | | Institution | Department of Pediatrics, Egleston Children's Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA. | | Source | Pediatrics 1996 Oct; 98(4 Pt 1):673-5. | | MeSH | Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Comparative Study
Emergencies
Emergency Service, Hospital
Enbucrilate
Female
Georgia
Hospitals, Pediatric
Humans
Infant
Male
Prospective Studies
Suture Techniques
Tissue Adhesives
Wounds and Injuries
| | Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of a tissue adhesive, Histoacryl Blue (HAB), for laceration repair in children.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: A tertiary care pediatric emergency center at Egleston Children's Hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Children who presented for laceration repair between October 1994 and February 1995 were prospectively evaluated. Patients less than 1 or greater than 18 years of age, those with lacerations greater than 5 cm, and those with lacerations located on the eyelids, ears, nose, lips, hands, feet, joints, or perineum were excluded.
INTERVENTIONS: Following consent and routine wound management, including subcutaneous closure when deemed necessary, patients were randomized to receive skin sutures or HAB for cutaneous closure.
METHODS: Length of time required for laceration repair was recorded. Parental perception of the pain experienced by their child was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Photographic documentation of scar appearance at the 2-month follow-up visit was evaluated by plastic surgeons using a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: Sixty-one children were enrolled: HAB group (N = 30), suture group (N = 31). No differences occurred between groups in laceration length, depth, location, or patient demographics. Length of time required for repair was decreased (median, HAB 7 minutes vs suture 17.0 minutes) and parental assessment of their child's pain was significantly less in the HAB group. Parents were more likely to recommend HAB over suturing to other parents or guardians. Cosmetic outcome in the HAB group was assessed to be as good as, or better than, the cosmetic outcome in the suture group as evaluated by two plastic surgeons.
CONCLUSION: The use of HAB for laceration repair is an acceptable alternative to conventional suturing with a comparable cosmetic outcome. Advantages include less pain to the child, no need for suture removal, and more efficient use of physician time. Parents were also more likely to recommend HAB over suturing for laceration repair. | | Language | eng | | Pub Type(s) | Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
| | PubMed ID | 8885944 |
|
