Unbound MEDLINE

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. [Acad Emerg Med] Journal article

 
TitleProspective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group.
Author(s)Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Valentine SM, Turque TW, McCuskey CF, Quinn JV 
InstitutionDepartment of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, University Medical Center, USA.
SourceAcad Emerg Med 1998 Feb; 5(2):94-9.
MeSHAdolescent
Adult
Bandages
Child
Child, Preschool
Comparative Study
Cyanoacrylates
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Prospective Studies
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Suture Techniques
Tissue Adhesives
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To compare a new tissue adhesive, 2-octylcyanoacrylate, with standard wound closure techniques for the repair of traumatic lacerations.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial enrolled consecutive patients > 1 year of age with non-bite, non-crush-induced lacerations who presented < 6 hours after injury. Structured closed-question data sheets were completed at the time of laceration repair and suture removal. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either 2-octylcyanoacrylate or standard wound closure. Infection was determined at the time of suture removal. Long-term cosmetic appearance (> 3 months) was assessed by physicians using a previously validated categorical cosmetic scale and by patients using a 100-mm visual analog scale.
RESULTS: There were 63 patients randomized to the octylcyanoacrylate group and 61 patients treated with standard wound closure techniques. The 2 treatment groups were similar with respect to age, gender, race, medical history, and wound characteristics. At the 5-to-10-day follow-up, only 1 wound was infected and only 2 wounds required reclosure due to dehiscence. These 3 patients received treatment with octylcyanoacrylate. At long-term follow-up, the cosmetic appearances were similar according to the patients (octylcyanoacrylate, 83.8 +/- 19.4 mm vs standard techniques, 82.5 +/- 17.6 mm; p = 0.72) and the physicians (optimal cosmetic appearance, 77% vs 80%; p = 0.67).
CONCLUSIONS: Wounds treated with octylcyanoacrylate and standard wound closure techniques have similar cosmetic appearances 3 months later.
Languageeng
Pub Type(s)Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
PubMed ID9492126
  
Advertise on this site.