Patient positioning, using "anti-deformity positioning," is a standard practice in burn rehabilitation to assist with edema management, scar contracture prevention, and wound healing. Consistently providing proper positioning requires the combined effort of the multidisciplinary burn team. Our primary goal was to increase the frequency that patients were correctly positioned to over 90%. At a medium-sized, academic burn unit, random audits were conducted by burn lead therapists on the compliance of proper patient positioning over 6 months. Using this data as a trigger, a quality improvement project was designed using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. Surveys were distributed to therapy and nursing staff to identify barriers to proper positioning. Effects on positioning compliance postintervention were monitored. In the 6 months prior to intervention, the average correct positioning was 76%. Surveys identified the following barriers to care: nursing needed more education and the approach was too heavily reliant on nursing efforts alone. To address this, therapists provided education to all nurses, communicated daily about positioning expectations, shifted the project to a multidisciplinary approach, and made changes in therapy workflow. The median compliance improved from 79% to 91% (P < .05). Coordinating efforts of the entire burn team improve consistency for positioning in burn patients. Utilizing the PDSA cycle allowed us to identify areas for improvement and develop appropriate interventions to increase education for nursing staff and workflow improvements for therapists. Following the completion of our interventions, we were able to obtain an immediate improvement in our patient positioning compliance.

Burn rehabilitation main goal is to minimize the consequences of hypertrophic scars and concomitant contractures. The treatment principles rely on the association of joint posture, continuous pressure completed with range of motion to prevent joint fusion (which happens to adults but not to children). Throughout the different treatment phases and wound evolution, reassessment is necessary to review rehabilitation goals and activities. During the acute phase the alternance of positioning is prioritized in order to keep the affected extremities in antideformity position using splint or other devices. At the rehabilitation phase, treatment is focussed on active/passive range of motion (skin posture) strengthening exercises and use of dynamic splint is introduced to correct contractures. After their discharge home, patients benefit from outpatient rehab until scar maturation (approximately 18 months). The treatment consists mainly on active/passive range of motion, scar massage, strengthening exercise and endurance retraining. Also modalities (such as thermal bath and high pressure water spray) are used to address itching problems and for scar softening. Finally, reconstructive surgery can be performed to correct excessive scarring or joint contracture for better functional or cosmetic outcome.

A search of the burn literature to find standard dimensions for fabrication of a typical splint to use with patients with a dorsal hand and finger burn is an elusive endeavor. The original impetus for such a search stemmed from a discussion with a student therapist on how to properly splint a burned hand. An ongoing interest was sustained when no one set of universal dimensions for a hand splint design was found to exist. In fact, the literature is replete with numerous individual recommendations on the dimensions to make such a hand splint. In general, dorsal hand burn splints can be classified either as position of function or antideformity splints. However, there is little agreement among authors about how to make these splints. The purpose of this investigation was to document the wide range and variable designs among splints for dorsal hand burns and present the findings for use as a resource guide when making decisions about their fabrication.

Children younger than 4 years of age who have sustained deep palmar burns pose a significant challenge to the burn care team. Flexion contractures of the palm and digits are all too common because the hand is maintained in flexion when at rest and while engaged in functional activities. A splint that positions the wrist in extension and the metacarpophalangeal joints of digits 2 to 5 in some hyperextension was evaluated. Nine patients with acute burns and two patients who required palmar reconstruction were studied. (The total number of hands was 15.) With this splinting technique, we have successfully maintained the antideformity position in patients with acute injuries and in those who have undergone reconstructive procedures.

To determine the best method for treating deep second- and third-degree burned hands in our institution, a prospective study comparing early excision and grafting with nonsurgical treatment was undertaken. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups, and the hands in the first group were excised and grafted within 5 days after the burn. In the second group, burns were treated with topical chemotherapy and hydrotherapy, and the eschar was allowed to separate spontaneously and heal. Some required skin grafting, forming a subgroup. All hands in the study received the same vigorous physical therapy twice daily, and splints were applied according to the patient's individual needs to maintain an anti-deformity position. Grip strength, power pinch, and accurate range-of-motion measurements of each finger joint were measured upon discharge and 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after the burn. A mean total degrees of motion (including flexion and extension) in each joint and strength values were determined for comparison among the three groups. At discharge, the spontaneously healed hands had the best range of motion and function. Although the rate of improved function was greatest in the interval from discharge to 6 months in all groups, by 1 year there was no statistical difference in function regardless of the initial treatment. Thus in deep second- and third-degree burns of the dorsum of the hand, care may be individualized according to other systemic factors without fear of sacrificing ultimate function.

A planned treatment program for burned hands has been developed and was used in 72 burns of the dorsum of the hands. Treatment was individualized on the basis of whether hand burns were superficial or deep. In the former, there was evidence of spontaneous reepithelialization within 14 to 21 days. In the latter, immediate or delayed excision, followed by resurfacing with autografts was done. Both groups received topical antibiotic creaming, elevation, an exercise program as soon as they were able, and splinting of the burned hand in the antideformity position. Hypertrophic scars and unacceptable epithelium were excised when they interfered with function. Initially, this program allowed us to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures in 94% of the second-degree burns of the dorsum of the hand. The third-degree burned hand needed excision and autografting in 100% of the burned hands. This treatment program has as its goals: prevention of deformity by early motion and protection of the unburned and regenerating epithelium by creaming with topical antibiotic ointment.