(arch width)
4,497 results
  • Different tools, same diagnosis? A comparison of digital orthodontic model analysis methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study. [Journal Article]
    Int Orthod. 2026 Sep 04; 24(4S):101239. [Online ahead of print]Ceylan D, Genç C, Duran GSIO
  • CONCLUSIONS: The free orthodontic software produced tooth-width and arch space deficiency measurements clinically comparable to those of the commercial platform and within clinically acceptable agreement limits of plaster-cast calliper measurements. Bolton ratio agreement was less interchangeable due to the cumulative aggregation of small per-tooth errors. These findings support the adoption of freely available orthodontics-specific software, particularly where commercial licensing is a barrier.
  • Optic disc morphology and myopia severity in eyes with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures. [Journal Article]
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2026 Sep 03. [Online ahead of print]Lin J, Dai T, … Zhu WGA
  • CONCLUSIONS: PHOMS were associated with a lower optic disc ovality index (ODOI, indicating greater optic disc tilt) and a smaller CDR. Although myopia severity (SE) was higher in PHOMS eyes in unadjusted comparisons, only ODOI remained independently associated with PHOMS in multivariable analysis. A combined prediction model using SE, ODOI, and CDR predicted PHOMS presence with good accuracy (AUC = 0.830). Eyes with PHOMS exhibit a characteristic topography of nasal pRNFL thinning and temporal/inferior thickening without evidence of glaucomatous damage. These findings support an association between PHOMS and myopia-related disc remodeling but do not prove that PHOMS directly cause optic disc damage.
  • Which intraoral parameters are prognostic factors for speech outcomes in incomplete cleft palate? [Journal Article]
    Arch Craniofac Surg. 2026 Aug; 27(4):173-179.An JH, Seo HJ, … Bae YCAC
  • CONCLUSIONS: Most intraoral anatomical parameters were not independently associated with speech outcome, suggesting that factors beyond simple anatomical measurements-particularly those related to restoring appropriate velopharyngeal function, such as reconstruction of the levator veli palatini muscle-may play a more important role. Nevertheless, preoperative straight palatal length, postoperative curved palatal length, and palatal width demonstrated meaningful associations with speech outcome. Therefore, these parameters should be considered when planning palatoplasty to optimize postoperative speech outcome.
  • Transperineal Ultrasound for Preoperative Pelvic Floor Assessment Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: Inter-Operator Reliability and Concordance With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. [Journal Article]
    Arch Esp Urol. 2026 Aug; 79(7):1123-1131.Carrero-García B, Gómez-Luque MÁ, … Medina-López RAAE
  • CONCLUSIONS: TPUS performed by urologists demonstrates reproducible inter-operator agreement for pelvic floor parameters, particularly MUL. Significant, though modest, concordance with MRI (moderate for MUL and PH and fair for UW and TUL) together with small absolute mean differences for the key parameters, suggests that TPUS provides clinically reasonable estimates despite limited individual-level interchangeability with MRI. TPUS is a reproducible tool with acceptable inter-operator reliability for key pelvic floor parameters, particularly MUL, and may serve as a complement to MRI or an accessible alternative. However, its individual-level interchangeability with MRI remains limited, and its predictive value for post-prostatectomy urinary continence has not yet been established and requires confirmation in prospective studies.
  • Exploration of multidimensional associations between craniomaxillofacial and dental arch structures. [Journal Article]
    BMC Oral Health. 2026 Aug 10; 26(1).Dong S, Xu A, … Che XBO
  • CONCLUSIONS: Significant correlations were identified between craniomaxillofacial structure and dental arch structure. Facial width, facial height, and mandibular body length were found to have strong effects on dental arch structure, particularly in the maxillary region (notably at the first molar). The craniomaxillofacial-dental arch system constitutes a complex, multilevel interactive network, suggesting that comprehensive orthodontic assessment should consider the relationships among these anatomical systems.