BACKGROUND:

Surgical treatment of giant clinoidal meningiomas remains a challenging task for neurosurgeons. Here, we present details of the surgical techniques for the dissection of encased perforators.

METHODS:

The dissection of encased perforators is summarized as follows: (1) split the tumor above the encased arteries and perforators; (2) find the entrance and exit points of the perforators, and estimate the running course of the perforators within the tumor; (3) dissect and expose the perforators along the estimated line.

CONCLUSIONS:

The surgical techniques described in this article will aid in achieving maximum tumor resection while preserving encased perforators.

BACKGROUND:

Three-dimensional (3-D) stereoscopic vision is theoretically superior to two-dimensional (2-D) vision in endoscopic endonasal surgery. However, only few reports have quantitatively compared endoscopic performance under the two visual conditions. We introduced a newly designed stereoendoscopic system with a "dual-lens and single camera" for endoscopic endonasal surgery and objectively compared the performances under 3-D and high-definition 2-D visualizations on a dry laboratory model.

METHODS:

Thirty subjects without experience performing endoscopic surgery, computer-simulated training or any 3-D video system were recruited and divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) for performing two different tasks. The novel 4.7-mm-diameter stereoendoscope provided high-definition (HD) images. In Task 1, Group A started the task under the 3-D condition followed by the 2-D condition, and Group B vice versa. In Task 2, Group A started the task under the 2-D condition followed by the 3-D condition, and Group B vice versa. The performance accuracy and speed under the two visual conditions were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Significant improvement in performance accuracy and speed was seen under 3-D conditions in the both "3-D first" and "2-D first" subgroups during both tasks (P < .001). Regardless of order, the inaccuracy rate and performance time under 3-D conditions was significantly lower than that under 2-D conditions in each subject.

CONCLUSIONS:

We demonstrated the advantage of 3-D visualization over 2-D visualization for inexperienced subjects. Further quantitative clinical studies are required to confirm whether stereoendoscopy actually provides benefits in clinical settings.

BACKGROUND:

Surgery represents the first-choice treatment for spinal intradural tumours. On the other hand, whether it is most appropriate in the setting of recurrences, residual or multiple lesions remains an open question. Moreover, some patients are less than ideal candidates for surgery. In this study we report about our own radiosurgery experience in the treatment of benign intradural extramedullary tumours of the spine.

METHODS:

In our study we analyzed the outcomes for 18 patients (21 lesions) treated for benign intradural extramedullary lesions, with a minimum follow-up period of 32 months. The lesions included 11 meningiomas, 9 schwannomas and 1 neurofibroma.

RESULTS:

The mean follow-up was 43 months (32-73 months). The median tumour volume was 2 cc (0.2-17.7 cc). Eleven lesions underwent single-fraction treatment (mean prescribed dose ranging from 10 to 13 Gy). The others received a multisession radiosurgery treatment (4-6 fractions) with a mean prescription dose ranging from 18.5 to 25 Gy. The maximum dose to the spinal cord ranged from 9.2 to 26 Gy. During the follow-up period, none of the lesions showed radiological evidence of progression. Neurological status was preserved or improved and no permanent sequelae were observed. Significant and durable pain relief was observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although surgical excision remains the primary treatment option for most intradural tumours, radiosurgery offers a real alternative therapeutic modality, especially in case of recurrent and residual lesions or when surgery is contraindicated.

BACKGROUND:

Pseudocapsules were first identified in pituitary adenoma surgery in 1936. Since then, the distinction between pituitary capsules and pseudocapsules has been unclear, and the definitions of these entities have varied. In this study, pituitary capsules and extracapsular dissection were examined retrospectively, intra- and extrapseudocapsular resection was evaluated, and dissection of the pituitary adenoma and pseudocapsule was examined prospectively.

METHODS:

Between January 2009 and May 2012, endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery was performed on 224 patients in the Department of Neurosurgery, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey. Data for 174 patients were analyzed retrospectively between January 2009 and December 2011, and 50 patients treated between December 2011 and May 2012 were included in a prospective study.

RESULTS:

In the retrospective phase of the study, capsules were examined in 21 of the 174 patients on whom extracapsular resection had been performed. In the 50 cases treated between December 2011 and May 2012, dissection of the pituitary capsule, adenohypophysis, and pseudocapsule was performed. In 30 patients in the prospective phase of the study, pseudocapsules were identified during intraoperative endoscopic observation. Remission was achieved in 28 of 33 functioning adenomas in the prospective study. The mean follow-up period in this group was 13 months.

CONCLUSION:

The endoscopic and histopathological evidence provided in this study demonstrates that the pituitary capsule and pseudocapsule are distinct structures. In addition, it is also shown that extracapsular dissection can be performed in functioning adenomas that invade the suprasellar region. Significantly higher rates of total resection and higher remission rates were observed in cases where extra- and intrapseudocapsular dissection was required.

BACKGROUND:

The S-shaped incision is a novel technique we have developed to minimise wound complications for the insertion of bilateral deep brain stimulators.

METHODS:

An S-shaped incision incorporating both burrholes allows better exposure compared to the traditional bilateral incisions. The burrholes are drilled under each limb of the S and the incision does not run across them, decreasing the risk of infection. The electrodes are subsequently tunneled down the right side and connected to the battery.

CONCLUSION:

The use of the S-shaped incision results in less wound and electrode complications compared to the traditional bilateral linear incisions in our experience.

Two cases of primary extraosseous intradural spinal Ewing's sarcoma are reported with a review of the current literature. This rare neoplasm shares features with cerebral primitive neuroectodermal tumors, complicating a correct diagnosis. Gross total resection seems to be the main treatment, although adjuvant therapies could improve the prognosis. In case 1, a 56-year-old man presented with cauda equina syndrome. MRI showed an intradural tumor from L4 to S2. An emergency laminectomy was performed with gross total resection of a hemorrhagic tumor, followed by adjuvant treatment. In the second case, a 25-year-old female developed leg and lumbar pain. MRI study identified a homogeneously enhancing intradural mass at the L2-L3 level. A laminoplasty was performed, followed by tumor resection; no adjuvant treatment was administered afterwards. Immunohistochemical workup confirmed the diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma in both cases.

BACKGROUND:

There is significant controversy surrounding the ideal management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. While several treatment and management algorithms have been proposed, the ideal treatment strategy for these fractures remains unsettled. The authors review their experience with short-segment posterior fusion followed by anterior thoracoscopic corpectomy for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS:

We identified all patients treated by a single surgeon at our institution from 2002 to 2009 with short-segment posterior fusion followed by anterior thoracoscopic corpectomy for unstable thoracolumbar junction burst fractures. Demographic data, mechanism of injury, classification of fracture, Cobb angle, American Spinal Injury Association score, associated injuries, tobacco use, follow-up duration, and radiographic studies were all collected. Outcomes were assessed for fracture alignment (preoperative, postoperative, and long-term follow-up kyphosis), rate of fusion, neurological outcome, and treatment complications.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two patients with burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junction defined as T10 to L1 were included. At a mean follow-up of 20.4 months, 90 % of patients had demonstrated radiographic evidence of fusion and 91 % retained the correction of their kyphotic deformity. There were three complications in the series.

CONCLUSIONS:

Short-segment posterior fusion with thoracoscopic anterior corpectomy represents an alternative to traditional open treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. A thoracoscopic approach allows for a short-segment posterior fusion, reducing the loss of adjacent motion segments, minimizes morbidity associated with traditional open anterior approaches, allows for anterior and posterior column stabilization, and is associated with a high rate of bony fusion.

BACKGROUND:

Uncertainty remains as to the role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) for primary evacuation of an acute subdural haematoma (ASDH). In 2011, a collaborative group of neurosurgeons, neuro-intensive care physicians and trial methodologists was formed in the UK with the aim of answering the following question: "What is the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of DC, in comparison to simple craniotomy for adult patients undergoing primary evacuation of an ASDH?" The proposed RESCUE-ASDH trial (Randomised Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Haematoma) is a multi-centre, pragmatic, parallel group randomised trial of DC versus simple craniotomy for adult head-injured patients with an ASDH. Clinical trials in the emergency setting face the problem that potential participants may be incapacitated and their next of kin initially unavailable. As a result, consent and enrolment of participants can often be difficult.

METHOD:

In the current study, we aimed to assess public opinion regarding participation in the RESCUE-ASDH trial and acceptability of surrogate consent by conducting a pre-protocol community consultation survey.

RESULTS:

One hundred and seventy-one subjects completed the survey. Eighty-four percent of participants responded positively when asked if they would participate in the proposed trial. Ninety-six percent and 91 % answered positively when asked if they found surrogate consent by their next of kin and an independent doctor acceptable, respectively. None of the characteristics of the study population were found to affect the decision to participate or the acceptability of surrogate consent by the next of kin. Being religious showed a trend towards higher acceptability of surrogate consent by a doctor. Conversely, an education to degree level and above showed a trend towards reduced acceptability of surrogate consent by a doctor.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our community consultation survey shows that the proposed trial is acceptable to the public. In addition, the results suggest high levels of acceptability of surrogate consent by next of kin or independent doctor amongst our community.