Objective.

We examined the sensitivity and specificity of an obesity diagnosis in a nationally representative sample of pediatric outpatient visits. Methods. We used the 2005 to 2009 National Ambulatory Medical Care and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care surveys. We included visits with children 2 to 18 years, yielding a sample of 48 145 database visits. We determined 3 methods of identifying obesity: documented body mass index (BMI) ≥95th percentile; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code; and positive answer to the question, "Does the patient now have obesity?" Using BMI as the gold standard, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of a clinical obesity diagnosis.

Results.

Among the 19.5% of children who were obese by BMI, 7.0% had an ICD-9 code and 15.2% had a positive response to questioning. The sensitivity of an obesity diagnosis was 15.4%, and the specificity was 99.2%.

Conclusions.

The sensitivity of the obesity diagnosis in pediatric ambulatory visits is low. Efforts are needed to increase identification of obese children.

Objective.

To examine the effect of hypothetical genetic susceptibility test results on diabetic parents' intention to prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D) in their children. Methods. Parents with T2D indicated their intention to prevent T2D in their youngest child at baseline and after a hypothetical positive and negative T2D genetic test result. We calculated mean/median "preventive intention scores" for each scenario and examined the association between parents' score change and parent/child characteristics.

Results.

A total of 63% of parents reported that their child had "almost no risk" or "slight risk" of developing T2D. Parents' median baseline preventive intention score was 8. It increased to 10 after a positive test result and decreased to 5 after a negative test result.

Conclusions.

Negative T2D genetic susceptibility test results may decrease diabetic parents' intentions to prevent T2D for their children. Future research studies in a real-life clinical context should examine this phenomenon.

Objective.

To evaluate the skills and team behavior of pediatric residents during resuscitation with a high-fidelity mannequin before and after a deliberate practice intervention. Methods. Each month residents participate in two 90-minute videorecorded sessions (2-3 weeks apart) in an "off-site" delivery room during their neonatal ICU rotation. Teams responded to a scenario that required 5 skills (positive pressure ventilation, chest compressions, endotracheal intubation, umbilical vein catheterization, and epinephrine administration). Skills were scored for technique and timeliness and team behaviors for communication, management, and leadership. A 2-hour focused intervention was given between sessions.

Results.

In all, 33 residents (11 teams) completed the sessions. Gaps in procedural skills noted during the first session were corrected. Timeliness for completion of skills remained below expectations. Improvements in team behaviors were noted.

Conclusions.

Deliberate practice improved procedural skills and team performance. Lack of improvement in timeliness suggests that a different educational paradigm is required.

Objective.

To determine referral patterns from pediatric primary care to subspecialists for overweight/obesity and related comorbidities. Methods. We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to identify overweight/obesity and 5 related comorbidities in primary care visits between 2005 and 2009 by children 6 to 18 years. The primary outcome was whether the visit ended in referral. We used multivariable analysis to examine factors associated with referral.

Results.

We identified 34 225 database visits. A total of 17.1% were with overweight (body mass index = 85th to 94th percentile) or obese (body mass index ≥ 95th percentile) patients. A total of 7.1% of primary care visits with overweight/obese children ended in referral. Referral was more likely when obesity was the reason for visit (odds ratio = 2.83; 95% confidence interval = 1.61-4.97) but was not associated with presence of a comorbidity (odds ratio = 1.35; 95% confidence interval = 0.75-2.44).

Conclusions.

Most overweight or obese children are not referred, regardless of comorbidity status. One reason may be low levels of appropriate diagnosis.