Introduction: Despite significant advances in diagnosis and supportive care, the majority of patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ultimately die of their disease. Standard intensive induction treatment continues to comprise cytarabine and a topoisomerase II (topo II) poison, usually an anthracycline. Vosaroxin , a novel first-in-class quinolone derivative has been developed for use in the treatment of AML as a new-generation topo II inhibitor. It has shown promising activity as a monotherapy and also in combination with intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC) in relapsed and refractory patient cohorts with minimal toxicity and good tolerability. Areas covered: The authors discuss the mechanism of action of vosaroxin, the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, preclinical and clinical trial results available as well as areas of ongoing research. Expert opinion: Vosaroxin has shown efficacy as a novel cytotoxic agent, and despite a similar mechanism of action has significant advantages over anthracyclines. It evades common resistance pathways of p53 and P-glycoprotein (P- gp) and does not appear to generate significant reactive oxygen species (ROS) associated with these agents. Should future investigation confirm its efficacy and advantageous safety profile, vosaroxin could potentially replace older generation topoisomerase poisons in the treatment of AML and other malignant conditions.

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although advanced NSCLC is still incurable, various anti-neoplastic agents have become available for the treatment of this disease. Pemetrexed , a multi-target folate antagonist, has improved the survival of non-squamous NSCLC patients. Currently, pemetrexed is approved for first-line treatment in combination with a platinum derivate, for second-line treatment as a single agent and, more recently, as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy. Areas covered: The authors analyzed the state of the art of pemetrexed through a review of the literature. Clinical trials and meta-analyses involving pemetrexed in NSCLC were evaluated. Pemetrexed improved survival of non-squamous NSCLC in first-line, maintenance, and second-line treatments; this benefit is limited to non-squamous histology. Because pemetrexed has become part of the standard of care, current clinical trials are designed to compare it to other investigational combinations. Limited data on resectable disease are available, and additional clinical trials are being conducted. Expert opinion: Pemetrexed has shown effectiveness and a favorable toxicity profile. Histology-driven indications and the relationship of pemetrexed with thymidylate synthase expression suggest that a more precise definition of predictive biomarkers could be further investigated.

Introduction: Clostridium difficile has become the most important healthcare-associated infection worldwide within the past decade. This is in part due to the emergence of a highly virulent epidemic strain of C. difficile as well as the relative ineffectiveness of current therapies at producing a sustained response. Fidaxomicin is a novel antibiotic that demonstrates a greater sustained response for C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) compared to existing drugs and its potential role as a prophylactic agent against C. difficile infection (CDI) is being intensely studied. Areas covered: In this article, we address the emergence of CDI and the current treatment options and identify the unmet needs of the marketplace. We also summarize the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of fidaxomicin, and review the current literature related to the use of fidaxomicin for both treatment and prophylaxis of CDI. Expert opinion: Fidaxomicin is clearly as effective in the treatment of CDAD as oral vancomycin. It has also been shown to reduce recurrent CDAD, and we hypothesize that the same properties that confer reduced recurrence make it a promising agent for prophylaxis, particularly in high-risk patients.

Introduction: Kinase inhibitors (KIs) are a class of anticancer drugs that inhibit activity of the enzymes protein kinases, which regulate crucial cellular processes and have a demonstrated role in human oncogenesis. Treatment of advanced forms of endocrine cancer which are not responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapies is challenging and use of KIs is gaining a growing role in this field. Areas covered: The authors summarize the main genetic alterations known to be linked to endocrine tumors, indicating the rationale for utilizing KIs. Furthermore, they present an updated analysis of clinical trials available on PubMed Central, which were pertinent to the activities of KIs in aggressive endocrine cancer. The authors also discuss the adverse effects of KIs and summarize likely involved underlying mechanisms. Expert opinion: KIs are effective in obtaining a radiological disease control and an improvement of progression-free survival in several forms of endocrine cancer but will never deliver a knockout blow of the disease, due to mechanisms of adaptation to circumvent the specific molecular blockade. The new frontier of KIs treatment is to identify agents that could synergize activity of KIs. The true goal will be to perform an overall genotyping of each tumor, thus predicting the impact of combined targeted therapies in the context of a particular constellation of mutant genes.

Introduction: The treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) depends on its etiology. For mucosal cancer, endoscopic resection is standard; while for locally advanced cancer, esophagectomy is the main treatment. When the tumor is more advanced, neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy is added. For unresectable cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard therapy. Areas covered: The standard chemotherapy for esophageal SCC is a cisplatin- and 5-fluorouracil (CF)-based regimen. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for unresectable esophageal SCC and is also an option for resectable tumors. For patients who are inoperable, concurrent CRT should be the standard of care. Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy is a promising candidate for chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy because an excellent local control rate and pathological remission rate have been reported. Although salvage surgery after definitive CRT is a practical treatment, judicious patient selection is crucial. Expert opinion: Presently, the standard regimen for esophageal SCC is CF. DCF is expected to be the next standard regimen. In the near future, some new therapeutic options, such as molecular targeted therapy or particle beam therapy, may confer further advantages. A thorough understanding of these therapeutic modalities is important to achieve this endeavor.

Introduction: Urticaria is a highly prevalent disease among people. First-choice treatment continues to be centred on the second-generation H1 antihistamines, including a wide group of drugs with a better therapeutic index (or risk:benefit ratio) than the classic ones, even in the high, off-label dosage occasionally required in chronic urticaria. Bilastine is a newly registered H1-antihistamine for treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria. With established antihistaminic and antiallergic properties, it is widely reviewed in the medical literature; however, to our knowledge, a specific review of bilastine's role in the treatment of urticaria was lacking. Areas covered: This article reviews the medical literature on the effectiveness and safety of bilastine in urticarial syndromes, either spontaneous or inducible, by means of a Medline search from 1990 to present, completed with some nonpublished data provided by the manufacturer. Expert opinion: Once-daily treatment with bilastine 20 mg is effective in managing symptoms and improving patient's quality of life in chronic urticaria, with at least comparable efficacy to levocetirizine. As far as studies in healthy volunteers, clinical assays, and recent clinical experience can establish, bilastine's safety profile is adequate, appearing to be entirely free from cardiovascular effects, and not impairing psychomotor performance or actual driving, even at twice the therapeutic dose.

Introduction: Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-i) are used for the oral treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Since the launch of sildenafil more than 15 years ago, new molecules have become available. At present, in addition to tadalafil and vardenafil, there are three other drugs, udenafil, avanafil and mirodenafil, marketed in some countries which appear to be promising. Areas covered: The clinical pharmacological differences in dosage and side effects of all PDE5-i are evaluated. Expert opinion: All PDE5-i are equally effective and safe for the treatment of ED. On-demand use of any PDE5-i is also safe for patients with comorbid conditions. Tadalafil seems to be the preferred drug by patients and physicians, probably due to its peculiar pharmacological profile that makes sexual intercourse more spontaneous for the patients. Preliminary data suggest that the use of vardenafil may also be beneficial in cases of ED associated with premature ejaculation. Daily treatment is another option in men with ED and documented vascular or prostate disease. In geriatric or in difficult-to-treat populations, the evaluation of testosterone plasma levels will help to predict the efficacy of any PDE5-i. Remarkably, when such drugs are withdrawn for any reason, ED most often continues to occur because of the presence of an underlying disease.

Any scientific innovation needs to translate into a significant benefit. Peginesatide is noninferior to other erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in terms of efficacy, and it shares the advantages of other long-acting ESAs: delayed administration frequency and no changes in dose needs according to the administration route. The molecular structure of peginesatide does not require the use of recombinant DNA technology during the manufacturing process, making its synthesis simpler and likely economically cheaper. During clinical development, its safety profile seemed to be safe, excepting the potential increase in the risk of safety end-point events in nondialysis CKD patients. However postmarketing serious hypersensitivity reactions have completely changed the scenario and urgently needs in-depth clarification. This promising drug seems to have prematurely finished its prospects.

Introduction: Myoclonic seizures can be observed in various clinical settings and different epileptic conditions, including some forms of both diopathic and symptomatic epilepsies. Relatively little has been written on treatment of myoclonic seizures. Some old antiepileptic drugs, such as valproate and some benzodiazepines, are widely used but more treatment options exist today for some newer antiepileptic drugs. Nevertheless, patients can be refractory to drug treatment and some drugs may exacerbate or even induce myoclonus. Areas covered: Key safety, tolerability, and efficacy data are presented for different antiepileptic drugs with antimyoclonic effect, alone and/or in combination. Expert opinion: Treatment of myoclonic seizures in children is mainly based on prospective and retrospective studies, with little evidence from randomized clinical trials. Valproate is commonly the first choice alone or in combination with some benzodiazepines or levetiracetam. There is still insufficient evidence for the use of topiramate and zonisamide as monotherapy. Of major importance remains avoidance of medication that may aggravate the seizures. Better understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms of myoclonic seizures and myoclonic epilepsies could yield great improvement in the treatment and quality of life of patients.