Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are the mainstay in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases. However, the performance of DPI formulations is highly dependent on the used inhaler device and the patient's inspiratory effort. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the aerosolization behavior of three commercially available capsule-based DPI medications-formoterol (Foradil[®]), glycopyrronium (Seebri[®] Breezhaler), and tiotropium (Spiriva[®])-delivered using three different capsule-based inhalers (Aerolizer, Breezhaler, and Handihaler), under varying flow conditions. Methods: The aerodynamic performance of each formulation-inhaler combination was assessed using the Next-Generation Impactor (NGI) and Dosage Unit Sampling Apparatus (DUSA) methodology. Fine particle dose (FPD) and aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) were determined at fixed flow rates of 15, 30, 60, and 100 L/min, as well as at inhaler-specific flow rates corresponding to a 4 kPa pressure drop. Chromatographic quantification of active ingredients was performed using validated HPLC methods specific to each drug. Results: The FPD values increased consistently with higher flow rates across all tested formulations and inhalers. At a 4 kPa pressure drop, Aerolizer and Breezhaler achieved significantly higher FPDs compared to Handihaler. Notably, in some instances, non-dedicated inhalers produced greater respirable fractions than the originally intended devices. APSD profiles revealed that drug deposition shifted toward smaller NGI stages at higher inspiratory flows, supporting enhanced deep lung delivery potential under optimal conditions. Conclusions: Device resistance, capsule orientation, and piercing mechanics substantially influence drug aerosolization. Although non-dedicated inhalers may offer improved FPDs in vitro, clinical use should adhere to approved drug-device combinations, as these have been validated for efficacy and safety under real-world conditions.

The effect of capsule aperture size on the aerosol performance of lactose blend formulation was studied using Foradil® (containing 12 μg of formoterol fumarate (FF[1]) and 24 mg of lactose) dispersed with a powder inhaler Aerolizer® at increasing air flowrates. Apertures sizes of 0.4, 1.0, 1.5, 2.5, and 4.0 mm were introduced at the opposite ends of the capsule. The formulation was dispersed into a Next Generation Impactor (NGI) at 30, 60 and 90 L/min, with the fine particle fractions (FPFrec and FPFem) measured by chemical assay of FF and lactose using high-performance liquid chromatography. Particle size distribution (PSD) of FF particles dispersed in wet media was also characterized by laser diffraction. FPFrec showed a stronger dependency on the flowrate than the capsule aperture size. The most efficient dispersion was achieved at 90 L/min. At a given flowrate, FPFem remained broadly constant across different aperture sizes. The laser diffraction studies demonstrated the presence of large agglomerates.

Objectives: The bronchodilator efficacy of a once-daily fixed-dose combination of tiotropium/formoterol (18/12 µg administered via a dry-powder inhaler, Discair) [TIO/FORMfixed group] vs a single-dose of tiotropium (18 µg) by Handihaler1 alone [TIOmono group], or combined with formoterol 12 µg twice-daily by Aerolizer2 [TIO/FORMbid group] was compared in patients with moderate-to-severe stable COPD.Methods: COPD patients were randomized (28 patients/group) to receive TIO/FORMfixed, TIOmono, or TIO/FORMbid. AUC for the changes in FEV1 and FVC over a 24-h period; bronchodilator response (100 ml improvement in FEV1) in the first 30 min; maximum changes in FEV1 and FVC; and safety data were recorded. The primary endpoint was to confirm the non-inferiority of TIO/FORMfixed vs TIO/FORMbid in terms of the AUC for the changes in FEV1 over a 24-h period.Results: Changes in AUC0-24h for FEV1 and FVC were similar for TIO/FORMfixed and TIO/FORMbid, and were superior to TIOmono (p < 0.001). A positive bronchodilator response at 30 min was demonstrated in 50%, 64%, and 71% of patients in the TIOmono, TIO/FORMbid, and TIO/FORMfixed groups, respectively (NS). Maximum FEV1 and FVC changes were measured as 0.25/0.41 L, 0.32/0.49 L, and 0.37/0.53 L, for TIOmono, TIO/FORMbid, and TIO/FORMfixed, respectively (FEV1: TIO/FORMfixed vs TIOmono, p = 0.0017 and TIO/FORMfixed vs TIO/FORMbid, p = 0.4846); no differences were recorded between the combination groups.Conclusions: The 24-h bronchodilator efficacy of TIO/FORMfixed 18/12 µg once-daily by Discair3 was non-inferior to a combination of tiotropium 18 µg by Handihaler plus formoterol 12 µg twice-daily by Aerolizer, and superior to tiotropium 18 µg monotherapy by Handihaler.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.15326/jcopdf.4.1.2016.0158.].

The full-resolution next generation impactor (NGI) and three abbreviated impactor systems were used to obtain the apparent aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) and other quality measures for marketed dry powder inhalers (DPIs) using the compendial method and efficient data analysis (EDA). APSD for the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in Spiriva® Handihaler®, Foradil® Aerolizer®, and Relenza® Diskhaler® was obtained using a full-resolution NGI at 39, 60, and 90 L/min, respectively. Two reduced NGI (rNGI) configurations, the filter-only configuration (rNGI-f) and the modified-cup configuration (rNGI-mc), and the fast-screening impactor (FSI) with appropriate inserts to provide a 5-μm cut size were evaluated. The fine particle dose (FPD) obtained using the FSI for Spiriva was statistically similar to that obtained using the full NGI. However, the FPD for both Foradil and Relenza obtained using the FSI was significantly different from that obtained using the full NGI. Despite this, no significant differences were observed for the fine particle fraction (FPF) obtained using the FSI relative to that obtained from the full NGI for any of the DPIs. The use of abbreviated impactor systems appears promising with good agreement observed with the full-resolution NGI, except for small differences observed for the rNGI-mc configuration. These small differences may be product- and/or flow rate-specific, and further evaluation will be required to resolve these differences.

The novel long-acting β2-agonist olodaterol demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in short-term phase II clinical studies. This analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III studies (1222.11, NCT00782210; 1222.12, NCT00782509; 1222.13, NCT00793624; 1222.14, NCT00796653) evaluated the long-term safety of olodaterol once daily (QD) in a large cohort of patients with moderate to very severe (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2-4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The studies compared olodaterol (5 or 10 μg) QD via Respimat®, formoterol 12 μg twice daily (BID) via Aerolizer® (1222.13 and 1222.14), and placebo for 48 weeks. Patients continued receiving background maintenance therapy, with ∼60% receiving concomitant cardiovascular therapy and 25% having a history of concomitant cardiac disease. Pre-specified analyses of pooled data assessed the adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs in the whole population, and in subgroups with cardiac disease, along with in-depth electrocardiogram and Holter monitoring. In total, 3104 patients were included in the safety analysis: 876 received olodaterol 5 μg, 883 received olodaterol 10 μg, 885 received placebos, and 460 received formoterol 12 μg BID. Overall incidence of on-treatment AEs (71.2%), serious AEs (16.1%), and deaths (1.7%) were balanced across treatment groups. Respiratory and cardiovascular AEs, including major adverse cardiac events, were reported at similar frequencies in placebo and active treatment groups. The safety profiles of both olodaterol 5 μg (marketed and registered dose) and 10 μg QD delivered via Respimat® are comparable to placebo and formoterol BID in this population, with no safety signals identified.

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of device design of the Aerolizer(®) on the aerosolization of a carrier-based dry powder inhaler formulation (Foradile(®)). The Aerolizer was modified by reducing the air inlet size and mouthpiece length to 1/3 of the original dimensions, or by increasing the grid voidage. Aerosolization of the powder formulation was assessed on a multi-stage liquid impinger at air flow rates of 30, 60, and 100 L/min. Coupled CFD-DEM simulations were performed to investigate the air flow pattern and particle impaction. There was no significant difference in the aerosolization behavior between the original and 1/3 mouthpiece length devices. Significant increases in FPF total and FPF emitted were demonstrated when the inlet size was reduced, and the results were explained by the increases in air velocity and turbulence from the CFD analysis. No significant differences were shown in FPF total and FPF emitted when the grid voidage was increased, but more drugs were found to deposit in induction port and to a lesser extent, the mouthpiece. This was supported by the CFD-DEM analysis which showed the particle-device collisions mainly occurred in the inhaler chamber, and the cross-grid design increased the particle-device collisions on both mouthpiece and induction port. The air inlet size and grid structure of the Aerolizer(®) were found to impact significantly on the aerosolization of the carrier-based powder.

The potent inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (fluticasone), and the long-acting β2-agonist with a rapid onset of action, formoterol fumarate (formoterol), have now been combined in a single aerosol inhaler, fluticasone/formoterol (flutiform). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy compared with its individual components administered concurrently via two separate inhalers.