Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them?
Prev Med. 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):581-9.PM

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper addresses the question of whether individuals who are most in need of household and car smoking bans, such as individuals with children living at home or who have many friends who smoke, are the ones who have them.

METHOD

A representative sample of 6985 California adults ages 18 and older participated in telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Overall, 76% of adults report having home smoking bans and 66% have car smoking bans. Being a smoker or African American, not having children in the home, having more friends who smoke, and lower household income were associated with lower prevalence of both home and car smoking bans (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, nonsmokers were 7.9 (95% CI = 3.56, 17.31) times more likely to have a home smoking ban when none of their friends were smokers compared to when most of their friends were smokers. Among smokers, there was an interaction between having children at home and the proportion of friends who smoke. Only 27 to 55% of smokers had home smoking bans unless most of their friends were smokers, then the odds of having a ban were 6.1 (95% CI = 2.76, 13.68) times higher for smokers with children (67% with home bans) than for smokers without children at home (25% with home bans).

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to increase home and car smoking bans for nonsmokers who have friends who smoke and smokers with children living at home are needed.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, Palo Alto 94304, USA. greg.norman@stanford.eduNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

10600441

Citation

Norman, G J., et al. "Smoking Bans in the Home and Car: Do Those Who Really Need Them Have Them?" Preventive Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6 Pt 1, 1999, pp. 581-9.
Norman GJ, Ribisl KM, Howard-Pitney B, et al. Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them? Prev Med. 1999;29(6 Pt 1):581-9.
Norman, G. J., Ribisl, K. M., Howard-Pitney, B., & Howard, K. A. (1999). Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them? Preventive Medicine, 29(6 Pt 1), 581-9.
Norman GJ, et al. Smoking Bans in the Home and Car: Do Those Who Really Need Them Have Them. Prev Med. 1999;29(6 Pt 1):581-9. PubMed PMID: 10600441.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Smoking bans in the home and car: Do those who really need them have them? AU - Norman,G J, AU - Ribisl,K M, AU - Howard-Pitney,B, AU - Howard,K A, PY - 1999/12/22/pubmed PY - 1999/12/22/medline PY - 1999/12/22/entrez SP - 581 EP - 9 JF - Preventive medicine JO - Prev Med VL - 29 IS - 6 Pt 1 N2 - BACKGROUND: This paper addresses the question of whether individuals who are most in need of household and car smoking bans, such as individuals with children living at home or who have many friends who smoke, are the ones who have them. METHOD: A representative sample of 6985 California adults ages 18 and older participated in telephone interviews. RESULTS: Overall, 76% of adults report having home smoking bans and 66% have car smoking bans. Being a smoker or African American, not having children in the home, having more friends who smoke, and lower household income were associated with lower prevalence of both home and car smoking bans (P < 0.01). In multivariate analyses, nonsmokers were 7.9 (95% CI = 3.56, 17.31) times more likely to have a home smoking ban when none of their friends were smokers compared to when most of their friends were smokers. Among smokers, there was an interaction between having children at home and the proportion of friends who smoke. Only 27 to 55% of smokers had home smoking bans unless most of their friends were smokers, then the odds of having a ban were 6.1 (95% CI = 2.76, 13.68) times higher for smokers with children (67% with home bans) than for smokers without children at home (25% with home bans). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase home and car smoking bans for nonsmokers who have friends who smoke and smokers with children living at home are needed. SN - 0091-7435 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/10600441/Smoking_bans_in_the_home_and_car:_Do_those_who_really_need_them_have_them L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091-7435(99)90574-1 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -