Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The ethics of medical marijuana: government restrictions vs. medical necessity.
J Public Health Policy. 2000; 21(1):40-60.JP

Abstract

Marijuana is listed by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as an illegal Schedule I drug which has no currently accepted medical use. However, on March 17, 1999, 11 independent scientists appointed by the Institute of Medicine reported that medical marijuana was effective in controlling some forms of pain, alleviating nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, treating wasting due to AIDS, and combating muscle spasms associated with multiple sclerosis. There was also no evidence that using marijuana would increase illicit drug use or that it was a "gateway" drug. Despite this evidence the DEA refuses to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, which would allow physicians to prescribe unadulterated and standardized forms of marijuana. After reviewing the pertinent scientific data and applying the principle of double effect, there is a proportionate reason for allowing physicians to prescribe marijuana. Seriously ill patients have the right to effective therapies. To deny patients access to such a therapy is to deny them dignity and respect as persons.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Saint Joseph's Philadelphia's Jesuit University, Pennsylvania 19131-1395, USA.

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

10754797

Citation

Clark, P A.. "The Ethics of Medical Marijuana: Government Restrictions Vs. Medical Necessity." Journal of Public Health Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, 2000, pp. 40-60.
Clark PA. The ethics of medical marijuana: government restrictions vs. medical necessity. J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(1):40-60.
Clark, P. A. (2000). The ethics of medical marijuana: government restrictions vs. medical necessity. Journal of Public Health Policy, 21(1), 40-60.
Clark PA. The Ethics of Medical Marijuana: Government Restrictions Vs. Medical Necessity. J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(1):40-60. PubMed PMID: 10754797.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The ethics of medical marijuana: government restrictions vs. medical necessity. A1 - Clark,P A, PY - 2001/2/7/pubmed PY - 2001/2/7/medline PY - 2001/2/7/entrez KW - Health Care and Public Health KW - Legal Approach SP - 40 EP - 60 JF - Journal of public health policy JO - J Public Health Policy VL - 21 IS - 1 N2 - Marijuana is listed by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as an illegal Schedule I drug which has no currently accepted medical use. However, on March 17, 1999, 11 independent scientists appointed by the Institute of Medicine reported that medical marijuana was effective in controlling some forms of pain, alleviating nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, treating wasting due to AIDS, and combating muscle spasms associated with multiple sclerosis. There was also no evidence that using marijuana would increase illicit drug use or that it was a "gateway" drug. Despite this evidence the DEA refuses to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, which would allow physicians to prescribe unadulterated and standardized forms of marijuana. After reviewing the pertinent scientific data and applying the principle of double effect, there is a proportionate reason for allowing physicians to prescribe marijuana. Seriously ill patients have the right to effective therapies. To deny patients access to such a therapy is to deny them dignity and respect as persons. SN - 0197-5897 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/10754797/The_ethics_of_medical_marijuana:_government_restrictions_vs__medical_necessity_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -