Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Poor predictive ability of urinalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2000 May; 113(5):709-13.AJ

Abstract

Results of urinalysis, particularly the leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests, often are used to determine whether treatment is needed or a culture will be performed in cases of suspected urinary tract infection. However, there is disagreement over the quality of urinalysis as a screening test for urinary tract infections. Final urine culture results (n = 225) were obtained from the clinical microbiology laboratory. Stepwise binary logistic regression was used to derive a model using presence of infection as determined by culture as the dependent variable and urinalysis results as independent variables. A second set of data (n = 128) then was obtained to test the model. Statistical significance and the ability to predict infection based on urinalysis results were determined. Results indicated a lack of sensitivity for leukocyte esterase, nitrite, and presence of bacteria in the microscopic examination as indicators of urinary tract infection.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

10800404

Citation

Van Nostrand, J D., et al. "Poor Predictive Ability of Urinalysis and Microscopic Examination to Detect Urinary Tract Infection." American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 113, no. 5, 2000, pp. 709-13.
Van Nostrand JD, Junkins AD, Bartholdi RK. Poor predictive ability of urinalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(5):709-13.
Van Nostrand, J. D., Junkins, A. D., & Bartholdi, R. K. (2000). Poor predictive ability of urinalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 113(5), 709-13.
Van Nostrand JD, Junkins AD, Bartholdi RK. Poor Predictive Ability of Urinalysis and Microscopic Examination to Detect Urinary Tract Infection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(5):709-13. PubMed PMID: 10800404.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Poor predictive ability of urinalysis and microscopic examination to detect urinary tract infection. AU - Van Nostrand,J D, AU - Junkins,A D, AU - Bartholdi,R K, PY - 2000/5/9/pubmed PY - 2000/5/20/medline PY - 2000/5/9/entrez SP - 709 EP - 13 JF - American journal of clinical pathology JO - Am J Clin Pathol VL - 113 IS - 5 N2 - Results of urinalysis, particularly the leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests, often are used to determine whether treatment is needed or a culture will be performed in cases of suspected urinary tract infection. However, there is disagreement over the quality of urinalysis as a screening test for urinary tract infections. Final urine culture results (n = 225) were obtained from the clinical microbiology laboratory. Stepwise binary logistic regression was used to derive a model using presence of infection as determined by culture as the dependent variable and urinalysis results as independent variables. A second set of data (n = 128) then was obtained to test the model. Statistical significance and the ability to predict infection based on urinalysis results were determined. Results indicated a lack of sensitivity for leukocyte esterase, nitrite, and presence of bacteria in the microscopic examination as indicators of urinary tract infection. SN - 0002-9173 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/10800404/Poor_predictive_ability_of_urinalysis_and_microscopic_examination_to_detect_urinary_tract_infection_ L2 - https://academic.oup.com/ajcp/article-lookup/doi/10.1309/428N-60XK-UQ3Q-BXLC DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -