Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water.
J Am Diet Assoc 2000; 100(7):777-83JA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of energy intakes estimated with the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method in women by conducting in-person and telephone interviews. Doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure were used for validation.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-five weight-stable women (mean age = 30 years, range = 19 to 46 years) participated.

DESIGN

Total energy expenditure was measured over a 14-day period using the doubly labeled water method. During this time, 4 multiple-pass 24-hour recalls were obtained from the women (2 in-person, 2 by telephone) who were provided 2-dimensional food models to estimate portion sizes. The Food Intake Analysis System was used to analyze recall data.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Paired t tests were conducted to examine differences between energy intake estimated from the telephone and in-person interviews. Agreement between the energy intake estimates from the telephone recalls and the in-person recalls was assessed using the technique of Bland and Altman. Paired t tests were used to compare energy intake estimated from the telephone and in-person recalls to total energy expenditure.

RESULTS

No significant difference in mean daily energy intake was found between the telephone (2,253 +/- 688 kcal) and in-person (2,173 +/- 656 kcal) interviews (P = .36). However, the mean energy intake from each interview method was significantly lower than total energy expenditure (2,644 +/- 503 kcal) (P = .006 and .001, respectively).

APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Underreporting of energy intake was widespread in the sample. Although the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method did not generate a group measure of energy intake that was accurate or unbiased, the telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recall was just as effective in estimating energy intake as the recall administered in-person. Dietetics professionals should be aware of the pervasive and serious problem of under-reporting of self-reported food intakes.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Kaiser Permanente, St Albans, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Language

eng

PubMed ID

10916515

Citation

Tran, K M., et al. "In-person Vs Telephone-administered Multiple-pass 24-hour Recalls in Women: Validation With Doubly Labeled Water." Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 100, no. 7, 2000, pp. 777-83.
Tran KM, Johnson RK, Soultanakis RP, et al. In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100(7):777-83.
Tran, K. M., Johnson, R. K., Soultanakis, R. P., & Matthews, D. E. (2000). In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100(7), pp. 777-83.
Tran KM, et al. In-person Vs Telephone-administered Multiple-pass 24-hour Recalls in Women: Validation With Doubly Labeled Water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100(7):777-83. PubMed PMID: 10916515.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. AU - Tran,K M, AU - Johnson,R K, AU - Soultanakis,R P, AU - Matthews,D E, PY - 2000/8/1/pubmed PY - 2000/8/6/medline PY - 2000/8/1/entrez SP - 777 EP - 83 JF - Journal of the American Dietetic Association JO - J Am Diet Assoc VL - 100 IS - 7 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of energy intakes estimated with the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method in women by conducting in-person and telephone interviews. Doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure were used for validation. SUBJECTS: Thirty-five weight-stable women (mean age = 30 years, range = 19 to 46 years) participated. DESIGN: Total energy expenditure was measured over a 14-day period using the doubly labeled water method. During this time, 4 multiple-pass 24-hour recalls were obtained from the women (2 in-person, 2 by telephone) who were provided 2-dimensional food models to estimate portion sizes. The Food Intake Analysis System was used to analyze recall data. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Paired t tests were conducted to examine differences between energy intake estimated from the telephone and in-person interviews. Agreement between the energy intake estimates from the telephone recalls and the in-person recalls was assessed using the technique of Bland and Altman. Paired t tests were used to compare energy intake estimated from the telephone and in-person recalls to total energy expenditure. RESULTS: No significant difference in mean daily energy intake was found between the telephone (2,253 +/- 688 kcal) and in-person (2,173 +/- 656 kcal) interviews (P = .36). However, the mean energy intake from each interview method was significantly lower than total energy expenditure (2,644 +/- 503 kcal) (P = .006 and .001, respectively). APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Underreporting of energy intake was widespread in the sample. Although the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method did not generate a group measure of energy intake that was accurate or unbiased, the telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recall was just as effective in estimating energy intake as the recall administered in-person. Dietetics professionals should be aware of the pervasive and serious problem of under-reporting of self-reported food intakes. SN - 0002-8223 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/10916515/In_person_vs_telephone_administered_multiple_pass_24_hour_recalls_in_women:_validation_with_doubly_labeled_water_ L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-8223(00)00227-3 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -