Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade.
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec; 35(5 Pt 1):977-93.HS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ; formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, AHCPR) first decade of focus on outcomes and effectiveness research (OER) and to identify needs and opportunities for the study of OER in the coming years.

DATA SOURCE

Study findings were collected in response to an inquiry by the Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research at AHRQ in July 1997 to all principal investigators (PIs) funded between 1989 and 1997. The request was for investigators to identify their "most salient findings" and supply material for up to three slides.

STUDY DESIGN

A taxonomy of 11 non-mutually exclusive categories was used to group the investigators' salient findings by characteristics of methodology or purpose. Two health services researchers assigned findings to up to three categories for each discrete study.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Responses were received from 61 (64 percent) of the 91 PIs, reporting on 115 studies. Of the 246 category assignments made, descriptive epidemiology was the most common (24 percent), followed by comparative effectiveness (17 percent) and economic assessments (12 percent). Most studies were retrospective analyses of administrative data. Viewed within a conceptual framework for assessing the impact of research, OER has built a solid foundation for future quality improvement efforts by identifying problems, generating hypotheses, and developing new methodologies and has had limited impact on health care policies, practices and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

OER has had moderate but significant success meeting initial expectations for the field. Challenges for the next generation of OER include advancing from hypothesis generation to definitive studies of effectiveness, and acceleration of the process by which findings effect policy, practice, and outcomes.

Links

PMC Free PDF

Authors+Show Affiliations

Stryer D
Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD, USA.
Tunis S
No affiliation info available
Hubbard H
No affiliation info available
Clancy C
No affiliation info available

MeSH

Attitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionData Interpretation, StatisticalForecastingHealth Services ResearchHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationResearch DesignResearch PersonnelSurveys and QuestionnairesTotal Quality ManagementUnited StatesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11130807

Citation

Stryer, D, et al. "The Outcomes of Outcomes and Effectiveness Research: Impacts and Lessons From the First Decade." Health Services Research, vol. 35, no. 5 Pt 1, 2000, pp. 977-93.
Stryer D, Tunis S, Hubbard H, et al. The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(5 Pt 1):977-93.
Stryer, D., Tunis, S., Hubbard, H., & Clancy, C. (2000). The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade. Health Services Research, 35(5 Pt 1), 977-93.
Stryer D, et al. The Outcomes of Outcomes and Effectiveness Research: Impacts and Lessons From the First Decade. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(5 Pt 1):977-93. PubMed PMID: 11130807.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The outcomes of outcomes and effectiveness research: impacts and lessons from the first decade. AU - Stryer,D, AU - Tunis,S, AU - Hubbard,H, AU - Clancy,C, PY - 2000/12/29/pubmed PY - 2001/2/28/medline PY - 2000/12/29/entrez SP - 977 EP - 93 JF - Health services research JO - Health Serv Res VL - 35 IS - 5 Pt 1 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ; formerly the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, AHCPR) first decade of focus on outcomes and effectiveness research (OER) and to identify needs and opportunities for the study of OER in the coming years. DATA SOURCE: Study findings were collected in response to an inquiry by the Center for Outcomes and Effectiveness Research at AHRQ in July 1997 to all principal investigators (PIs) funded between 1989 and 1997. The request was for investigators to identify their "most salient findings" and supply material for up to three slides. STUDY DESIGN: A taxonomy of 11 non-mutually exclusive categories was used to group the investigators' salient findings by characteristics of methodology or purpose. Two health services researchers assigned findings to up to three categories for each discrete study. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Responses were received from 61 (64 percent) of the 91 PIs, reporting on 115 studies. Of the 246 category assignments made, descriptive epidemiology was the most common (24 percent), followed by comparative effectiveness (17 percent) and economic assessments (12 percent). Most studies were retrospective analyses of administrative data. Viewed within a conceptual framework for assessing the impact of research, OER has built a solid foundation for future quality improvement efforts by identifying problems, generating hypotheses, and developing new methodologies and has had limited impact on health care policies, practices and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: OER has had moderate but significant success meeting initial expectations for the field. Challenges for the next generation of OER include advancing from hypothesis generation to definitive studies of effectiveness, and acceleration of the process by which findings effect policy, practice, and outcomes. SN - 0017-9124 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11130807/The_outcomes_of_outcomes_and_effectiveness_research:_impacts_and_lessons_from_the_first_decade_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -