Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

What is the renal replacement method of first choice for intensive care patients?
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001 Feb; 12 Suppl 17:S40-3.JA

Abstract

Renal replacement therapy for the patient with acute renal failure on the intensive care unit can be offered in several different formats: intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and slow low-efficient daily dialysis (SLEDD). It is frequently claimed that CRRT offers several advantages over IHD, but most of these, such as correction of metabolic acidosis, better recovery of renal function, better clinical outcome due to application of biocompatible dialysis membranes, correction of malnutrition, and better removal of cytokines, are not corroborated by the results of controlled prospective studies. There is also no evidence that CRRT results in a better survival, compared with IHD. The only potential advantages of CRRT that stood the test of clinical evaluation (hemodynamic stability, correction of hypervolemia, better solute removal) can be offered as well by SLEDD. In addition, the latter strategy is less expensive because the same infrastructure is used as for IHD, while the patient is not immobilized continuously, which leaves time free for other activities such as nursing care and technical investigations. SLEDD is a relatively young technique, so thorough clinical studies are lacking. Nevertheless, the hypothesis is proposed that SLEDD offers a valuable alternative to the classical dialysis strategies, applied in the intensive care patient.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Nephrology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Gent, Belgium. raymond.vanholder@rug.ac.beNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11251030

Citation

Vanholder, R, et al. "What Is the Renal Replacement Method of First Choice for Intensive Care Patients?" Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, vol. 12 Suppl 17, 2001, pp. S40-3.
Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Lameire N. What is the renal replacement method of first choice for intensive care patients? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12 Suppl 17:S40-3.
Vanholder, R., Van Biesen, W., & Lameire, N. (2001). What is the renal replacement method of first choice for intensive care patients? Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 12 Suppl 17, S40-3.
Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Lameire N. What Is the Renal Replacement Method of First Choice for Intensive Care Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12 Suppl 17:S40-3. PubMed PMID: 11251030.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - What is the renal replacement method of first choice for intensive care patients? AU - Vanholder,R, AU - Van Biesen,W, AU - Lameire,N, PY - 2001/3/17/pubmed PY - 2001/5/22/medline PY - 2001/3/17/entrez SP - S40 EP - 3 JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN JO - J Am Soc Nephrol VL - 12 Suppl 17 N2 - Renal replacement therapy for the patient with acute renal failure on the intensive care unit can be offered in several different formats: intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and slow low-efficient daily dialysis (SLEDD). It is frequently claimed that CRRT offers several advantages over IHD, but most of these, such as correction of metabolic acidosis, better recovery of renal function, better clinical outcome due to application of biocompatible dialysis membranes, correction of malnutrition, and better removal of cytokines, are not corroborated by the results of controlled prospective studies. There is also no evidence that CRRT results in a better survival, compared with IHD. The only potential advantages of CRRT that stood the test of clinical evaluation (hemodynamic stability, correction of hypervolemia, better solute removal) can be offered as well by SLEDD. In addition, the latter strategy is less expensive because the same infrastructure is used as for IHD, while the patient is not immobilized continuously, which leaves time free for other activities such as nursing care and technical investigations. SLEDD is a relatively young technique, so thorough clinical studies are lacking. Nevertheless, the hypothesis is proposed that SLEDD offers a valuable alternative to the classical dialysis strategies, applied in the intensive care patient. SN - 1046-6673 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11251030/What_is_the_renal_replacement_method_of_first_choice_for_intensive_care_patients DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -
Try the Free App:
Prime PubMed app for iOS iPhone iPad
Prime PubMed app for Android
Prime PubMed is provided
free to individuals by:
Unbound Medicine.