Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A randomized clinical trial of pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer: which is the better technique, Roux-en-Y or interposition?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 May-Jun; 48(39):903-7.H

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine the optimum pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy, we conducted a randomized trial to compare the usefulness between PR and PI in terms of quality of life.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty patients younger than 70 years of age were selected and randomly classified into the following 2 groups: pouch and Roux-en-Y (PR; n = 15) and pouch and interposition (PI; n = 15). In each subject, the postoperative symptoms, food intake in a single meal, body weight, serum nutritional parameters, endoscopy, emptying time of the gastric substitute, and gallstone formation were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of the postprandial symptoms, food intake, body weight, and serum nutritional parameters until 2 years postoperative. Endoscopy showed a tendency of food stasis in the PR group, although this was not significant. The gastric emptying test in the PR group indicated that the retention capacity was slightly superior to that in the PI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of the duodenal passage on symptoms and nutrition could not be ascertained.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Second Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizonocho, Moriguchi, Osaka, 570, Japan.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11462953

Citation

Nakane, Y, et al. "A Randomized Clinical Trial of Pouch Reconstruction After Total Gastrectomy for Cancer: Which Is the Better Technique, Roux-en-Y or Interposition?" Hepato-gastroenterology, vol. 48, no. 39, 2001, pp. 903-7.
Nakane Y, Michiura T, Inoue K, et al. A randomized clinical trial of pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer: which is the better technique, Roux-en-Y or interposition? Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48(39):903-7.
Nakane, Y., Michiura, T., Inoue, K., Iiyama, H., Okumura, S., Yamamichi, K., & Hioki, K. (2001). A randomized clinical trial of pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer: which is the better technique, Roux-en-Y or interposition? Hepato-gastroenterology, 48(39), 903-7.
Nakane Y, et al. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Pouch Reconstruction After Total Gastrectomy for Cancer: Which Is the Better Technique, Roux-en-Y or Interposition. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 May-Jun;48(39):903-7. PubMed PMID: 11462953.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A randomized clinical trial of pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy for cancer: which is the better technique, Roux-en-Y or interposition? AU - Nakane,Y, AU - Michiura,T, AU - Inoue,K, AU - Iiyama,H, AU - Okumura,S, AU - Yamamichi,K, AU - Hioki,K, PY - 2001/7/21/pubmed PY - 2002/1/17/medline PY - 2001/7/21/entrez SP - 903 EP - 7 JF - Hepato-gastroenterology JO - Hepatogastroenterology VL - 48 IS - 39 N2 - BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the optimum pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy, we conducted a randomized trial to compare the usefulness between PR and PI in terms of quality of life. METHODOLOGY: Thirty patients younger than 70 years of age were selected and randomly classified into the following 2 groups: pouch and Roux-en-Y (PR; n = 15) and pouch and interposition (PI; n = 15). In each subject, the postoperative symptoms, food intake in a single meal, body weight, serum nutritional parameters, endoscopy, emptying time of the gastric substitute, and gallstone formation were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of the postprandial symptoms, food intake, body weight, and serum nutritional parameters until 2 years postoperative. Endoscopy showed a tendency of food stasis in the PR group, although this was not significant. The gastric emptying test in the PR group indicated that the retention capacity was slightly superior to that in the PI group. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of the duodenal passage on symptoms and nutrition could not be ascertained. SN - 0172-6390 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11462953/A_randomized_clinical_trial_of_pouch_reconstruction_after_total_gastrectomy_for_cancer:_which_is_the_better_technique_Roux_en_Y_or_interposition L2 - https://medlineplus.gov/stomachcancer.html DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -