Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This study assessed a resin modified glass ionomer bonding system, Fuji ortho L.C. using different bonding techniques and compared it with a composite control (Transbond).
DESIGN
Ex vivo study. Twenty extracted premolar teeth in each group were bonded as follows: (i) Group 1 Control (Transbond); (ii) Group 2 Fuji ortho L.C. without an etch procedure/wet enamel surface; (iii) Group 3 Fuji ortho L.C. without an etch procedure/dry enamel surface; (iv) Group 4 Fuji ortho L.C. using a conventional acid etch technique.
OUTCOME
Shear bond strength, site of bond failure and adhesive remnant index.
RESULTS
Brackets bonded as recommended by the manufacturer (Group 2) have significantly (p < 0.001) lower bond strengths compared with the control (Group 1). Bonding with an etch technique (Group 4) will significantly (p < 0.001) increase the bond strength compared with the other Fuji groups. All the Fuji groups tended to fail at the enamel/resin interface with lower ARI scores compared with the control.
CONCLUSION
The lower bond strength of Fuji ortho L.C. would limit its use as a routine bonding agent. When bonded with an acid etch technique, the bond strength may be sufficient for low loading situations such as the upper anterior teeth.
TY - JOUR
T1 - An ex vivo assessment of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in relation to bonding technique.
AU - Larmour,C J,
AU - Stirrups,D R,
PY - 2001/8/16/pubmed
PY - 2002/1/16/medline
PY - 2001/8/16/entrez
SP - 207
EP - 10
JF - Journal of orthodontics
JO - J Orthod
VL - 28
IS - 3
N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study assessed a resin modified glass ionomer bonding system, Fuji ortho L.C. using different bonding techniques and compared it with a composite control (Transbond). DESIGN: Ex vivo study. Twenty extracted premolar teeth in each group were bonded as follows: (i) Group 1 Control (Transbond); (ii) Group 2 Fuji ortho L.C. without an etch procedure/wet enamel surface; (iii) Group 3 Fuji ortho L.C. without an etch procedure/dry enamel surface; (iv) Group 4 Fuji ortho L.C. using a conventional acid etch technique. OUTCOME: Shear bond strength, site of bond failure and adhesive remnant index. RESULTS: Brackets bonded as recommended by the manufacturer (Group 2) have significantly (p < 0.001) lower bond strengths compared with the control (Group 1). Bonding with an etch technique (Group 4) will significantly (p < 0.001) increase the bond strength compared with the other Fuji groups. All the Fuji groups tended to fail at the enamel/resin interface with lower ARI scores compared with the control. CONCLUSION: The lower bond strength of Fuji ortho L.C. would limit its use as a routine bonding agent. When bonded with an acid etch technique, the bond strength may be sufficient for low loading situations such as the upper anterior teeth.
SN - 1465-3125
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11504897/An_ex_vivo_assessment_of_a_resin_modified_glass_ionomer_cement_in_relation_to_bonding_technique_
L2 - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1093/ortho/28.3.207?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -