Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects.
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Aug; 86(4):789-96.JA

Abstract

A limitation of the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) literature is that theory and empirical evidence suggest that some employees define OCBs as part of their job. A theoretical framework that addresses this problem is tested in this article. The framework focuses on 2 effects: a role enlargement effect (i.e., employees with more favorable attitudes define OCB as inrole behavior, which, in turn, results in greater citizenship) and a role discretion effect (i.e., the relationship between employees' attitudes and their citizenship will be stronger among employees who define OCB as extrarole behavior). In tests of this framework with 2 independent samples of supervisor-subordinate dyads, role definitions were found to moderate several relationships between procedural justice and OCB, providing support for the role discretion effect. Implications for OCB theory and research are discussed.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Management, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, USA. bjtepper@email.uncc.eduNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11519662

Citation

Tepper, B J., et al. "Justice, Citizenship, and Role Definition Effects." The Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 86, no. 4, 2001, pp. 789-96.
Tepper BJ, Lockhart D, Hoobler J. Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(4):789-96.
Tepper, B. J., Lockhart, D., & Hoobler, J. (2001). Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 789-96.
Tepper BJ, Lockhart D, Hoobler J. Justice, Citizenship, and Role Definition Effects. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(4):789-96. PubMed PMID: 11519662.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. AU - Tepper,B J, AU - Lockhart,D, AU - Hoobler,J, PY - 2001/8/25/pubmed PY - 2001/9/8/medline PY - 2001/8/25/entrez SP - 789 EP - 96 JF - The Journal of applied psychology JO - J Appl Psychol VL - 86 IS - 4 N2 - A limitation of the organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) literature is that theory and empirical evidence suggest that some employees define OCBs as part of their job. A theoretical framework that addresses this problem is tested in this article. The framework focuses on 2 effects: a role enlargement effect (i.e., employees with more favorable attitudes define OCB as inrole behavior, which, in turn, results in greater citizenship) and a role discretion effect (i.e., the relationship between employees' attitudes and their citizenship will be stronger among employees who define OCB as extrarole behavior). In tests of this framework with 2 independent samples of supervisor-subordinate dyads, role definitions were found to moderate several relationships between procedural justice and OCB, providing support for the role discretion effect. Implications for OCB theory and research are discussed. SN - 0021-9010 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11519662/Justice_citizenship_and_role_definition_effects_ L2 - http://content.apa.org/journals/apl/86/4/789 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -