Skitka, L J., et al. "Automation Bias and Errors: Are Crews Better Than Individuals?" The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1, 2000, pp. 85-97.
Skitka LJ, Mosier KL, Burdick M, et al. Automation bias and errors: are crews better than individuals? Int J Aviat Psychol. 2000;10(1):85-97.
Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., Burdick, M., & Rosenblatt, B. (2000). Automation bias and errors: are crews better than individuals? The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10(1), 85-97.
Skitka LJ, et al. Automation Bias and Errors: Are Crews Better Than Individuals. Int J Aviat Psychol. 2000;10(1):85-97. PubMed PMID: 11543300.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Automation bias and errors: are crews better than individuals?
AU - Skitka,L J,
AU - Mosier,K L,
AU - Burdick,M,
AU - Rosenblatt,B,
PY - 2001/9/7/pubmed
PY - 2001/9/11/medline
PY - 2001/9/7/entrez
SP - 85
EP - 97
JF - The International journal of aviation psychology
JO - Int J Aviat Psychol
VL - 10
IS - 1
N2 - The availability of automated decision aids can sometimes feed into the general human tendency to travel the road of least cognitive effort. Is this tendency toward "automation bias" (the use of automation as a heuristic replacement for vigilant information seeking and processing) ameliorated when more than one decision maker is monitoring system events? This study examined automation bias in two-person crews versus solo performers under varying instruction conditions. Training that focused on automation bias and associated errors successfully reduced commission, but not omission, errors. Teams and solo performers were equally likely to fail to respond to system irregularities or events when automated devices failed to indicate them, and to incorrectly follow automated directives when the contradicted other system information.
SN - 1050-8414
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11543300/Automation_bias_and_errors:_are_crews_better_than_individuals
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine