Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The effectiveness of 0.5-lb increments in progressive resistance exercise.
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb; 15(1):86-91.JS

Abstract

A traditional progressive resistance exercise program consists of increasing the number of repetitions at a constant load until exceeding an established repetition range. Subsequently, the load is increased by 1.1 kg (2.5 lb) or more, and the lifter works at the new load until again exceeding the repetition range. This investigation examines the use of small incremental loads for 2 upper-body exercises (bench press and triceps press). Subjects were randomly assigned to traditional (TRAD) progressive resistance exercise (5 women, 5 men) and small increment (SI) progressive resistance exercise (5 women, 4 men) groups. Initially, both groups trained for 8 weeks using TRAD progressive resistance exercise. Subjects who achieved 7 repetitions on the final set of an exercise increased the load for the next session by 2.2 (bench press) or 1.1 kg (triceps press). Following the initial 8-week training period, the TRAD group continued for another 8 weeks following the same protocol, whereas the SI group trained for an additional 8 weeks, increasing the load by 0.22 kg (0.5 lb) when completing 7 or 8 repetitions and 0.44 kg (1 lb) when achieving 9 or more repetitions. All groups, except TRAD women, made significant increases in 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the bench press. Both TRAD men and SI men significantly increased 1RM triceps press. Groups that did not significantly increase 1RM, in either the bench press or triceps press, demonstrated similar trends. For TRAD men and SI men, the number of repetitions to failure for the bench press at 60% 1RM decreased after training. Both regimens proved effective for increasing strength throughout 8 weeks. In conclusion, SI progressive resistance exercise appears to be as effective as TRAD progressive resistance exercise for increasing strength during 8 weeks in short-term pretrained college-aged men and women. However, preliminary data suggest that the TRAD progressive resistance exercise program might be a more effective method of increasing resistance during an extended period.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11708713

Citation

Hostler, D, et al. "The Effectiveness of 0.5-lb Increments in Progressive Resistance Exercise." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 15, no. 1, 2001, pp. 86-91.
Hostler D, Crill MT, Hagerman FC, et al. The effectiveness of 0.5-lb increments in progressive resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):86-91.
Hostler, D., Crill, M. T., Hagerman, F. C., & Staron, R. S. (2001). The effectiveness of 0.5-lb increments in progressive resistance exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 15(1), 86-91.
Hostler D, et al. The Effectiveness of 0.5-lb Increments in Progressive Resistance Exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):86-91. PubMed PMID: 11708713.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The effectiveness of 0.5-lb increments in progressive resistance exercise. AU - Hostler,D, AU - Crill,M T, AU - Hagerman,F C, AU - Staron,R S, PY - 2001/11/16/pubmed PY - 2002/1/5/medline PY - 2001/11/16/entrez SP - 86 EP - 91 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 15 IS - 1 N2 - A traditional progressive resistance exercise program consists of increasing the number of repetitions at a constant load until exceeding an established repetition range. Subsequently, the load is increased by 1.1 kg (2.5 lb) or more, and the lifter works at the new load until again exceeding the repetition range. This investigation examines the use of small incremental loads for 2 upper-body exercises (bench press and triceps press). Subjects were randomly assigned to traditional (TRAD) progressive resistance exercise (5 women, 5 men) and small increment (SI) progressive resistance exercise (5 women, 4 men) groups. Initially, both groups trained for 8 weeks using TRAD progressive resistance exercise. Subjects who achieved 7 repetitions on the final set of an exercise increased the load for the next session by 2.2 (bench press) or 1.1 kg (triceps press). Following the initial 8-week training period, the TRAD group continued for another 8 weeks following the same protocol, whereas the SI group trained for an additional 8 weeks, increasing the load by 0.22 kg (0.5 lb) when completing 7 or 8 repetitions and 0.44 kg (1 lb) when achieving 9 or more repetitions. All groups, except TRAD women, made significant increases in 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the bench press. Both TRAD men and SI men significantly increased 1RM triceps press. Groups that did not significantly increase 1RM, in either the bench press or triceps press, demonstrated similar trends. For TRAD men and SI men, the number of repetitions to failure for the bench press at 60% 1RM decreased after training. Both regimens proved effective for increasing strength throughout 8 weeks. In conclusion, SI progressive resistance exercise appears to be as effective as TRAD progressive resistance exercise for increasing strength during 8 weeks in short-term pretrained college-aged men and women. However, preliminary data suggest that the TRAD progressive resistance exercise program might be a more effective method of increasing resistance during an extended period. SN - 1064-8011 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11708713/The_effectiveness_of_0_5_lb_increments_in_progressive_resistance_exercise_ L2 - http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=linkout&SEARCH=11708713.ui DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -