Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.
Facial Plast Surg. 1999; 15(2):101-9.FP

Abstract

The objective of this article is to assess the quality of digital images versus standard 35-mm photodocumentation and to undertake a comparative assessment of 35-mm and digital photography in a clinical setting in facial plastic surgery. For evaluation of image quality, 10 subjects had images captured via a conventional 35-mm single lens reflex (SLR) camera and a digital camera under identical lighting conditions. The digital images were transferred to computer hard drive and processed for production of slides. Direct side-by-side comparison of projected images was performed by the authors. The standard photographic slides were of slightly finer detail and crispness than the computer-generated images. In a clinical setting, the quality of both the 35-mm and digital photographs enables complete preoperative evaluation and assessment of postsurgical outcome.

Links

Publisher Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Wall S
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kazahaya K
No affiliation info available
Becker SS
No affiliation info available
Becker DG
No affiliation info available

MeSH

FaceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInformation Storage and RetrievalMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPatient Education as TopicPhotographyReproducibility of ResultsSurgery, Plastic

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11816120

Citation

Wall, S, et al. "Thirty-five Millimeter Versus Digital Photography: Comparison of Photographic Quality and Clinical Evaluation." Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS, vol. 15, no. 2, 1999, pp. 101-9.
Wall S, Kazahaya K, Becker SS, et al. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(2):101-9.
Wall, S., Kazahaya, K., Becker, S. S., & Becker, D. G. (1999). Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS, 15(2), 101-9.
Wall S, et al. Thirty-five Millimeter Versus Digital Photography: Comparison of Photographic Quality and Clinical Evaluation. Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(2):101-9. PubMed PMID: 11816120.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. AU - Wall,S, AU - Kazahaya,K, AU - Becker,S S, AU - Becker,D G, PY - 2002/1/31/pubmed PY - 2002/3/5/medline PY - 2002/1/31/entrez SP - 101 EP - 9 JF - Facial plastic surgery : FPS JO - Facial Plast Surg VL - 15 IS - 2 N2 - The objective of this article is to assess the quality of digital images versus standard 35-mm photodocumentation and to undertake a comparative assessment of 35-mm and digital photography in a clinical setting in facial plastic surgery. For evaluation of image quality, 10 subjects had images captured via a conventional 35-mm single lens reflex (SLR) camera and a digital camera under identical lighting conditions. The digital images were transferred to computer hard drive and processed for production of slides. Direct side-by-side comparison of projected images was performed by the authors. The standard photographic slides were of slightly finer detail and crispness than the computer-generated images. In a clinical setting, the quality of both the 35-mm and digital photographs enables complete preoperative evaluation and assessment of postsurgical outcome. SN - 0736-6825 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11816120/Thirty_five_millimeter_versus_digital_photography:_comparison_of_photographic_quality_and_clinical_evaluation_ L2 - https://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-2008-1064306 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -