Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Dec; 258(10):505-8.EA

Abstract

Perception of nasal stuffiness, together with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessments were evaluated before and after nasal and/or sinus surgery in 50 Japanese adult patients. Nasal resistance on both expiration and inspiration correlated well with the patients' perceptions (P<0.05). Nasal volumes (0-4 cm and 0-7 cm) obtained from acoustic rhinometry measurements also correlated well with perception (P<0.05). No significant relationships were found between rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results. Perceptional nasal obstruction, rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results (except for the sectional areas at the I-notch) improved significantly after the operations. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry are valuable methods for assessing nasal stuffiness, but we must take account of the differences between the two methods.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Otolaryngology, Fujita Health University, School of Medicine, Kutsukake Toyoake, Aichi, Japan. knaito@fujita-hu.ac.jpNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11829185

Citation

Naito, K, et al. "Comparison of Perceptional Nasal Obstruction With Rhinomanometric and Acoustic Rhinometric Assessment." European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated With the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 258, no. 10, 2001, pp. 505-8.
Naito K, Miyata S, Saito S, et al. Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258(10):505-8.
Naito, K., Miyata, S., Saito, S., Sakurai, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2001). Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment. European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology : Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : Affiliated With the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 258(10), 505-8.
Naito K, et al. Comparison of Perceptional Nasal Obstruction With Rhinomanometric and Acoustic Rhinometric Assessment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258(10):505-8. PubMed PMID: 11829185.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment. AU - Naito,K, AU - Miyata,S, AU - Saito,S, AU - Sakurai,K, AU - Takeuchi,K, PY - 2002/2/7/pubmed PY - 2002/7/12/medline PY - 2002/2/7/entrez SP - 505 EP - 8 JF - European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery JO - Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol VL - 258 IS - 10 N2 - Perception of nasal stuffiness, together with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessments were evaluated before and after nasal and/or sinus surgery in 50 Japanese adult patients. Nasal resistance on both expiration and inspiration correlated well with the patients' perceptions (P<0.05). Nasal volumes (0-4 cm and 0-7 cm) obtained from acoustic rhinometry measurements also correlated well with perception (P<0.05). No significant relationships were found between rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results. Perceptional nasal obstruction, rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results (except for the sectional areas at the I-notch) improved significantly after the operations. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry are valuable methods for assessing nasal stuffiness, but we must take account of the differences between the two methods. SN - 0937-4477 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11829185/Comparison_of_perceptional_nasal_obstruction_with_rhinomanometric_and_acoustic_rhinometric_assessment_ L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004050100360 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -