Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Ratings of perceived exertion in active muscle during high-intensity and low-intensity resistance exercise.
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Feb; 16(1):87-91.JS

Abstract

This investigation compared ratings of perceived exertion specific to the active muscles used during resistance exercise (RPE-AM) using the 15-category Borg scale during high-intensity (HIP) and low-intensity (LIP) weight lifting. Ten men (23.2 +/- 3.6 years) and 10 women (21.8 +/- 2.7 years) performed 2 trials consisting of seven exercises: bench press (BP), leg press, latissimus dorsi pull down, triceps press, biceps curl, shoulder press, and calf raise. The HIP and LIP protocols were completed in counterbalanced order. During HIP, subjects completed 5 repetitions using 90% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). RPE-AM was measured after every repetition. During LIP, subjects completed 15 repetitions using 30% of 1RM. RPE-AM was measured after every third repetition. RPE-AMs were greater (p <or= 0.001) for HIP than for LIP for each exercise. For example, the mean initial BP RPE was 14.11 +/- 2.08 for the HIP and 8.34 +/- 1.35 for the LIP. Performing few repetitions using heavier weight is perceived to be more difficult than lifting comparatively lighter weight with more repetitions when external work is held constant.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA. gearhart@siu.edu.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11834111

Citation

Gearhart, Randall F., et al. "Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Active Muscle During High-intensity and Low-intensity Resistance Exercise." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 16, no. 1, 2002, pp. 87-91.
Gearhart RF, Goss FL, Lagally KM, et al. Ratings of perceived exertion in active muscle during high-intensity and low-intensity resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(1):87-91.
Gearhart, R. F., Goss, F. L., Lagally, K. M., Jakicic, J. M., Gallagher, J., Gallagher, K. I., & Robertson, R. J. (2002). Ratings of perceived exertion in active muscle during high-intensity and low-intensity resistance exercise. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 16(1), 87-91.
Gearhart RF, et al. Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Active Muscle During High-intensity and Low-intensity Resistance Exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(1):87-91. PubMed PMID: 11834111.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Ratings of perceived exertion in active muscle during high-intensity and low-intensity resistance exercise. AU - Gearhart,Randall F,Jr AU - Goss,Fredric L, AU - Lagally,Kristen M, AU - Jakicic,John M, AU - Gallagher,Jere, AU - Gallagher,Kara I, AU - Robertson,Robert J, PY - 2002/2/9/pubmed PY - 2002/3/29/medline PY - 2002/2/9/entrez SP - 87 EP - 91 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 16 IS - 1 N2 - This investigation compared ratings of perceived exertion specific to the active muscles used during resistance exercise (RPE-AM) using the 15-category Borg scale during high-intensity (HIP) and low-intensity (LIP) weight lifting. Ten men (23.2 +/- 3.6 years) and 10 women (21.8 +/- 2.7 years) performed 2 trials consisting of seven exercises: bench press (BP), leg press, latissimus dorsi pull down, triceps press, biceps curl, shoulder press, and calf raise. The HIP and LIP protocols were completed in counterbalanced order. During HIP, subjects completed 5 repetitions using 90% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). RPE-AM was measured after every repetition. During LIP, subjects completed 15 repetitions using 30% of 1RM. RPE-AM was measured after every third repetition. RPE-AMs were greater (p <or= 0.001) for HIP than for LIP for each exercise. For example, the mean initial BP RPE was 14.11 +/- 2.08 for the HIP and 8.34 +/- 1.35 for the LIP. Performing few repetitions using heavier weight is perceived to be more difficult than lifting comparatively lighter weight with more repetitions when external work is held constant. SN - 1064-8011 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11834111/Ratings_of_perceived_exertion_in_active_muscle_during_high_intensity_and_low_intensity_resistance_exercise_ L2 - http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;PAGE=linkout&amp;SEARCH=11834111.ui DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -