Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer.
Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jan-Feb; 14(1):81-6.IJ

Abstract

PURPOSE

This prospective clinical trial evaluated the clinical acceptability of a new material, ceromer, used for inlay and onlay restorations in single- or multisurface cavities of posterior teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three Targis inlay and onlay restorations were placed in 25 patients and evaluated using the United States Public Health Service criteria. The laboratory work was conducted by three dental technicians according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Twenty-five restorations were luted with Syntac bonding system and Variolink II, and 18 were luted with Scotchbond Multi Purpose and Opal Luting Composite. The recalls were done at 6, 12, and 18 months. Restorations were evaluated for six parameters and scored as ideal (A), clinically acceptable (B), or clinically unacceptable (C).

RESULTS

Indirect restorations received, after 18 months, scores of A at the following rates: color match 77%; marginal discoloration 93%; secondary caries 100%; anatomic form 93%; and marginal integrity 95%. For these parameters, statistical analysis indicated no significant differences at baseline and after 18 months. Postoperative hypersensitivity was reported by seven patients at baseline, but it decreased and there was no hypersensitivity at 12- and 18-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

Over an 18-month period the Targis restorative system yielded good clinical service.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, Italy. cmonaco@iol.itNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11842911

Citation

Monaco, C, et al. "Short-term Clinical Evaluation of Inlay and Onlay Restorations Made With a Ceromer." The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 14, no. 1, 2001, pp. 81-6.
Monaco C, Baldissara P, dall'Orologio GD, et al. Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(1):81-6.
Monaco, C., Baldissara, P., dall'Orologio, G. D., & Scotti, R. (2001). Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 14(1), 81-6.
Monaco C, et al. Short-term Clinical Evaluation of Inlay and Onlay Restorations Made With a Ceromer. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 Jan-Feb;14(1):81-6. PubMed PMID: 11842911.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer. AU - Monaco,C, AU - Baldissara,P, AU - dall'Orologio,G D, AU - Scotti,R, PY - 2002/2/15/pubmed PY - 2002/3/8/medline PY - 2002/2/15/entrez SP - 81 EP - 6 JF - The International journal of prosthodontics JO - Int J Prosthodont VL - 14 IS - 1 N2 - PURPOSE: This prospective clinical trial evaluated the clinical acceptability of a new material, ceromer, used for inlay and onlay restorations in single- or multisurface cavities of posterior teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three Targis inlay and onlay restorations were placed in 25 patients and evaluated using the United States Public Health Service criteria. The laboratory work was conducted by three dental technicians according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Twenty-five restorations were luted with Syntac bonding system and Variolink II, and 18 were luted with Scotchbond Multi Purpose and Opal Luting Composite. The recalls were done at 6, 12, and 18 months. Restorations were evaluated for six parameters and scored as ideal (A), clinically acceptable (B), or clinically unacceptable (C). RESULTS: Indirect restorations received, after 18 months, scores of A at the following rates: color match 77%; marginal discoloration 93%; secondary caries 100%; anatomic form 93%; and marginal integrity 95%. For these parameters, statistical analysis indicated no significant differences at baseline and after 18 months. Postoperative hypersensitivity was reported by seven patients at baseline, but it decreased and there was no hypersensitivity at 12- and 18-month follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Over an 18-month period the Targis restorative system yielded good clinical service. SN - 0893-2174 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11842911/Short_term_clinical_evaluation_of_inlay_and_onlay_restorations_made_with_a_ceromer_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -