Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Primary care reform. Physicians' participation in Hamilton-Wentworth.
Can Fam Physician. 2002 Feb; 48:306-13.CF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine physicians' reasons for and against participating in a primary care reform (PCR) pilot project, to identify demographic and practice characteristics associated with participation, to gauge physicians' satisfaction with implementation of the project, and to seek suggestions for change.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional mailed survey using a self-administered questionnaire.

SETTING

Family practices in Hamilton-Wentworth, Ont.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-two of 107 (76.6%) physicians who participated in the pilot project and 101 of 150 (67.3% of a 60% random sample of the area's remaining generalist physicians) who chose not to participate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Physicians' primary and secondary motives for participating or not; comments on the pilot project; and subjects' demographic, professional, and practice characteristics.

RESULTS

Despite their experience with capitation practice, after controlling for other factors, physicians from health service organizations were no more likely than their fee-for-service colleagues to join the pilot project. Those in large group practices were more likely to participate. Both participants and non-participants were concerned about disrupting call groups, burdening office staff, not having enough time, and whether the project's objectives were achievable. Other key findings were how few patients declined enrolment and how many physicians had unrealistic ideas about the demands of participation and the capabilities of currently available information technology.

CONCLUSION

While many Hamilton-area physicians were eligible and willing to participate in a PCR pilot project, many were not. Our findings suggest that physicians and government should clarify their expectations for PCR and that we need to look for better ways to register patients and select information technology for PCR.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Family Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ont. ineimani@mcmaster.caNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

11889890

Citation

Neimanis, Ieva M., et al. "Primary Care Reform. Physicians' Participation in Hamilton-Wentworth." Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, vol. 48, 2002, pp. 306-13.
Neimanis IM, Paterson JM, Allega RL. Primary care reform. Physicians' participation in Hamilton-Wentworth. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:306-13.
Neimanis, I. M., Paterson, J. M., & Allega, R. L. (2002). Primary care reform. Physicians' participation in Hamilton-Wentworth. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, 48, 306-13.
Neimanis IM, Paterson JM, Allega RL. Primary Care Reform. Physicians' Participation in Hamilton-Wentworth. Can Fam Physician. 2002;48:306-13. PubMed PMID: 11889890.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Primary care reform. Physicians' participation in Hamilton-Wentworth. AU - Neimanis,Ieva M, AU - Paterson,J Michael, AU - Allega,Rossano L, PY - 2002/3/14/pubmed PY - 2002/3/27/medline PY - 2002/3/14/entrez SP - 306 EP - 13 JF - Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien JO - Can Fam Physician VL - 48 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine physicians' reasons for and against participating in a primary care reform (PCR) pilot project, to identify demographic and practice characteristics associated with participation, to gauge physicians' satisfaction with implementation of the project, and to seek suggestions for change. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey using a self-administered questionnaire. SETTING: Family practices in Hamilton-Wentworth, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two of 107 (76.6%) physicians who participated in the pilot project and 101 of 150 (67.3% of a 60% random sample of the area's remaining generalist physicians) who chose not to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians' primary and secondary motives for participating or not; comments on the pilot project; and subjects' demographic, professional, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Despite their experience with capitation practice, after controlling for other factors, physicians from health service organizations were no more likely than their fee-for-service colleagues to join the pilot project. Those in large group practices were more likely to participate. Both participants and non-participants were concerned about disrupting call groups, burdening office staff, not having enough time, and whether the project's objectives were achievable. Other key findings were how few patients declined enrolment and how many physicians had unrealistic ideas about the demands of participation and the capabilities of currently available information technology. CONCLUSION: While many Hamilton-area physicians were eligible and willing to participate in a PCR pilot project, many were not. Our findings suggest that physicians and government should clarify their expectations for PCR and that we need to look for better ways to register patients and select information technology for PCR. SN - 0008-350X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/11889890/Primary_care_reform__Physicians'_participation_in_Hamilton_Wentworth_ L2 - http://www.cfp.ca/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=11889890 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -