Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.
J Fam Pract. 1999 Oct; 48(10):762-8.JF

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P < .001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Family Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7136, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

12224673

Citation

Flocke, S A., et al. "Does Managed Care Restrictiveness Affect the Perceived Quality of Primary Care? a Report From ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network." The Journal of Family Practice, vol. 48, no. 10, 1999, pp. 762-8.
Flocke SA, Orzano AJ, Selinger HA, et al. Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(10):762-8.
Flocke, S. A., Orzano, A. J., Selinger, H. A., Werner, J. J., Vorel, L., Nutting, P. A., & Stange, K. C. (1999). Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. The Journal of Family Practice, 48(10), 762-8.
Flocke SA, et al. Does Managed Care Restrictiveness Affect the Perceived Quality of Primary Care? a Report From ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(10):762-8. PubMed PMID: 12224673.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. AU - Flocke,S A, AU - Orzano,A J, AU - Selinger,H A, AU - Werner,J J, AU - Vorel,L, AU - Nutting,P A, AU - Stange,K C, PY - 2002/9/13/pubmed PY - 2002/9/24/medline PY - 2002/9/13/entrez SP - 762 EP - 8 JF - The Journal of family practice JO - J Fam Pract VL - 48 IS - 10 N2 - BACKGROUND: The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P < .001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSIONS: Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness. SN - 0094-3509 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/12224673/Does_managed_care_restrictiveness_affect_the_perceived_quality_of_primary_care_A_report_from_ASPN__Ambulatory_Sentinel_Practice_Network_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -