Valproate for acute mood episodes in bipolar disorder.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (1):CD004052CD
Bipolar disorder is a common debilitating illness, characterised by acute affective episodes with full or partial inter-episode remission. Effective and acceptable treatment of acute episodes is required. Valproate has become a leading adjunctive and alternative mood stabilising treatment to lithium in bipolar disorder.
To determine the efficacy and acceptability of valproate in the treatment of acute episodes of bipolar disorder.
The search included the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Registrar (CCDANCTR), the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (CCTR), reference lists of relevant papers and books, and contact with authors of trials, experts and pharmaceutical companies.
Randomised controlled trials comparing valproate with placebo, other mood stabilisers and antipsychotic medication in the treatment of any bipolar affective episode. Participants were of both sexes, of all ages, with a diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder approximating to ICD 10 Code F31 and DSM IV 296.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers blind to the authorship and source of papers. Ten randomised controlled trials were found comparing valproate with other interventions in mania. None was found examining its use in depression or mixed affective episodes. Data were extracted on the main outcome 'failure to respond by the end of the study' assessed by a less than 50% reduction in the Young Mania Rating Scale or the SADS-S mania scale. Three trials (316 participants) compared valproate with placebo. Three trials (158 participants) compared valproate with lithium. Two trials (363 participants) compared valproate with olanzapine. One trial (36 participants) compared valproate with haloperidol. Two trials (59 patients) compared valproate with carbamazepine. Acceptability of treatment was estimated using the outcome measure 'total number of subjects withdrawing from the study'. Three trials (321 patients) contributed to the comparison between valproate and placebo, two studies (144 patients) contributed to the comparison with lithium. One study (30 patients) provided data on this outcome in the comparison between valproate and carbamazepine. Pooled relative risks (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated using fixed effect approaches.
Valproate was more efficacious than placebo (RRR 38%; RR 0.62; 95% C.I. 0.51 to 0.77) in the treatment of mania. There was no significant difference between valproate and lithium (RRI 5%; RR 1.05; 95% C.I. 0.74-1.50) or between valproate and carbamazepine (RRR 34%; RR 0.66; 95% C.I. 0.38 to 1.16). Valproate was less effective than olanzapine (failure to achieve clinical response; RRI 25%; RR 1.25, 95% C.I. 1.01 to 1.54; average of 2.8 point less change on the Mania Rating Scale (95% CI 0.83 to 4.79). There were no significant differences in acceptability as measured by total number of subjects withdrawing from the study. There were significant differences in the side effect profiles of valproate and olanzapine, with more sedation and weight gain on olanzapine.
There is consistent, if limited, evidence to suggest that valproate is an efficacious treatment for acute mania. Valproate may be less effective than olanzapine but may cause less sedation and weight gain. More well designed, randomised controlled trials investigating the relative efficacy and acceptability of valproate in the treatment of the full range of acute affective episodes occurring in bipolar disorder are required.