Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Surg Endosc 2003; 17(7):1055-60SE

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing the length of the Roux limb in open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively increases excess weight loss in superobese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >50 kg/m2. Extending the RYGB limb length for obese patients with a BMI < 50 could produce similar results. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of superobese patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB with standard (< or =100-cm) with those undergoing the procedure with an extended (150-cm) Roux limb length over 1-year period of follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective data over 2.5 years were reviewed to identify patients with a BMI < 50 who underwent primary laparoscopic RYGB with 1-year follow-up (n = 58). Forty-five patients (sRYGB group) received limb lengths < or = 100 cm, including 45 cm (n = 1), 50 cm (n = 2), 60 cm (n = 6), 65 cm (n = 1), 70 cm (n = 1), 75 cm (n = 3), and 100 cm (n = 31). Thirteen patients (eRYGB group) received 150-cm limbs. Postoperative weight loss was compared at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Comparing the sRYGB vs the eRYGB group (average +/- SD), respectively: There were no significant differences in age (41.5 +/- 11.0 vs 38.0 +/- 11.9 years), preoperative weight (119.2 +/- 11.9 vs 127.8 +/- 12.5 kg), BMI (43.7 +/- 3.0 vs 45.2 +/- 3.5 kg/m2), operative time (167.1 +/- 72.7 vs 156.5 +/- 62.4 min), estimated blood loss (129.9 +/- 101.1 vs 166.8 +/- 127.3 cc), or length of stay (median, 3 vs 3 days; range, 2-18 vs 3-19). Body weight decreased over time in both groups, except in the sRYGB group between 3 and 6 months and 6 and 12 months after surgery and in the eRYGB group between 6 and 12 months. BMI also decreased over time, except in the eRYGB group between 6 and 12 months. Absolute weight loss leveled out between 6 and 12 months in both groups, with no increase after 6 months. Percent of excess weight loss did not increase in the eRYGB group after 6 months. An extended Roux limb did not significantly affect body weight, BMI, absolute weight loss, or precent of excess weight loss at any time point when the two groups were compared. A trend toward an increased proportion of patients with >50% excess weight loss (p = 0.07) was observed in the extended Roux limb group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, no difference in weight loss outcome variables were observed up to 1 year after laparoscopic RYGB. Thus, extending Roux limb length from < or =100 cm to 150 cm did not significantly improve weight loss outcome in patients with a BMI < 50 kg/m2.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1103, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

12728380

Citation

Feng, J J., et al. "Effect of Standard Vs Extended Roux Limb Length On Weight Loss Outcomes After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass." Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 17, no. 7, 2003, pp. 1055-60.
Feng JJ, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(7):1055-60.
Feng, J. J., Gagner, M., Pomp, A., Korgaonkar, N. M., Jacob, B. P., Chu, C. A., ... Inabnet, W. B. (2003). Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgical Endoscopy, 17(7), pp. 1055-60.
Feng JJ, et al. Effect of Standard Vs Extended Roux Limb Length On Weight Loss Outcomes After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(7):1055-60. PubMed PMID: 12728380.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of standard vs extended Roux limb length on weight loss outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. AU - Feng,J J, AU - Gagner,M, AU - Pomp,A, AU - Korgaonkar,N M, AU - Jacob,B P, AU - Chu,C A, AU - Voellinger,D C, AU - Quinn,T, AU - Herron,D M, AU - Inabnet,W B, Y1 - 2003/05/06/ PY - 2002/03/16/received PY - 2002/09/18/accepted PY - 2003/5/3/pubmed PY - 2005/11/9/medline PY - 2003/5/3/entrez SP - 1055 EP - 60 JF - Surgical endoscopy JO - Surg Endosc VL - 17 IS - 7 N2 - BACKGROUND: Increasing the length of the Roux limb in open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively increases excess weight loss in superobese patients with a body mass index (BMI) >50 kg/m2. Extending the RYGB limb length for obese patients with a BMI < 50 could produce similar results. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of superobese patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB with standard (< or =100-cm) with those undergoing the procedure with an extended (150-cm) Roux limb length over 1-year period of follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective data over 2.5 years were reviewed to identify patients with a BMI < 50 who underwent primary laparoscopic RYGB with 1-year follow-up (n = 58). Forty-five patients (sRYGB group) received limb lengths < or = 100 cm, including 45 cm (n = 1), 50 cm (n = 2), 60 cm (n = 6), 65 cm (n = 1), 70 cm (n = 1), 75 cm (n = 3), and 100 cm (n = 31). Thirteen patients (eRYGB group) received 150-cm limbs. Postoperative weight loss was compared at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: Comparing the sRYGB vs the eRYGB group (average +/- SD), respectively: There were no significant differences in age (41.5 +/- 11.0 vs 38.0 +/- 11.9 years), preoperative weight (119.2 +/- 11.9 vs 127.8 +/- 12.5 kg), BMI (43.7 +/- 3.0 vs 45.2 +/- 3.5 kg/m2), operative time (167.1 +/- 72.7 vs 156.5 +/- 62.4 min), estimated blood loss (129.9 +/- 101.1 vs 166.8 +/- 127.3 cc), or length of stay (median, 3 vs 3 days; range, 2-18 vs 3-19). Body weight decreased over time in both groups, except in the sRYGB group between 3 and 6 months and 6 and 12 months after surgery and in the eRYGB group between 6 and 12 months. BMI also decreased over time, except in the eRYGB group between 6 and 12 months. Absolute weight loss leveled out between 6 and 12 months in both groups, with no increase after 6 months. Percent of excess weight loss did not increase in the eRYGB group after 6 months. An extended Roux limb did not significantly affect body weight, BMI, absolute weight loss, or precent of excess weight loss at any time point when the two groups were compared. A trend toward an increased proportion of patients with >50% excess weight loss (p = 0.07) was observed in the extended Roux limb group. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, no difference in weight loss outcome variables were observed up to 1 year after laparoscopic RYGB. Thus, extending Roux limb length from < or =100 cm to 150 cm did not significantly improve weight loss outcome in patients with a BMI < 50 kg/m2. SN - 1432-2218 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/12728380/Effect_of_standard_vs_extended_Roux_limb_length_on_weight_loss_outcomes_after_laparoscopic_Roux_en_Y_gastric_bypass_ L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8933-4 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -