Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Costs and clinical outcomes of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a decision analytic model.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr; 98(4):763-70.AJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines recommend upper endoscopic screening for patients with hepatic cirrhosis and primary prophylaxis with a nonselective beta-blocker for those with large varices.

METHODS

However, only 25% of cirrhotics develop large varices. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the most cost-effective approach for primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Using a Markov model, we compared the costs and clinical outcomes of three strategies for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. In the first strategy, patients were given a beta-blocker without undergoing upper endoscopy. In the second strategy, patients underwent upper endoscopic screening; those found to have large varices were treated with a beta-blocker. In the third strategy, no prophylaxis was used. Selected sensitivity analyses were performed to validate outcomes. Our results show screening prophylaxis was associated with a cost of $37,300 and 5.72 quality-adjusted life yr (QALYs). Universal prophylaxis was associated with a cost of $34,100 and 6.65 QALYs. The no prophylaxis strategy was associated with a cost of $36,600 and 4.84 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $800/QALY for the endoscopic strategy relative to the no prophylaxis strategy. Screening endoscopy was cost saving when the compliance, bleed risk without beta-blocker, and variceal bleed costs were increased, and when the discount rate, bleed risk on beta-blockers, and cost of upper endoscopy were decreased. In contrast, the universal prophylaxis strategy was persistently cost saving relative to the no prophylaxis strategy. In comparing the strategies, sensitivity analysis on the death rates from variceal hemorrhage did not alter outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide economic and clinical support for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Universal prophylaxis with beta-blocker is preferred because it is consistently associated with the lowest costs and highest QALYs.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Dumont-UCLA Liver Transplant Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

12738453

Citation

Saab, Sammy, et al. "Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis: a Decision Analytic Model." The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 98, no. 4, 2003, pp. 763-70.
Saab S, DeRosa V, Nieto J, et al. Costs and clinical outcomes of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a decision analytic model. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(4):763-70.
Saab, S., DeRosa, V., Nieto, J., Durazo, F., Han, S., & Roth, B. (2003). Costs and clinical outcomes of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a decision analytic model. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 98(4), 763-70.
Saab S, et al. Costs and Clinical Outcomes of Primary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Hepatic Cirrhosis: a Decision Analytic Model. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(4):763-70. PubMed PMID: 12738453.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Costs and clinical outcomes of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: a decision analytic model. AU - Saab,Sammy, AU - DeRosa,Vincent, AU - Nieto,Jose, AU - Durazo,Francisco, AU - Han,Steven, AU - Roth,Bennett, PY - 2003/5/10/pubmed PY - 2003/6/12/medline PY - 2003/5/10/entrez SP - 763 EP - 70 JF - The American journal of gastroenterology JO - Am J Gastroenterol VL - 98 IS - 4 N2 - OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend upper endoscopic screening for patients with hepatic cirrhosis and primary prophylaxis with a nonselective beta-blocker for those with large varices. METHODS: However, only 25% of cirrhotics develop large varices. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the most cost-effective approach for primary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage. RESULTS: Using a Markov model, we compared the costs and clinical outcomes of three strategies for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. In the first strategy, patients were given a beta-blocker without undergoing upper endoscopy. In the second strategy, patients underwent upper endoscopic screening; those found to have large varices were treated with a beta-blocker. In the third strategy, no prophylaxis was used. Selected sensitivity analyses were performed to validate outcomes. Our results show screening prophylaxis was associated with a cost of $37,300 and 5.72 quality-adjusted life yr (QALYs). Universal prophylaxis was associated with a cost of $34,100 and 6.65 QALYs. The no prophylaxis strategy was associated with a cost of $36,600 and 4.84 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $800/QALY for the endoscopic strategy relative to the no prophylaxis strategy. Screening endoscopy was cost saving when the compliance, bleed risk without beta-blocker, and variceal bleed costs were increased, and when the discount rate, bleed risk on beta-blockers, and cost of upper endoscopy were decreased. In contrast, the universal prophylaxis strategy was persistently cost saving relative to the no prophylaxis strategy. In comparing the strategies, sensitivity analysis on the death rates from variceal hemorrhage did not alter outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide economic and clinical support for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Universal prophylaxis with beta-blocker is preferred because it is consistently associated with the lowest costs and highest QALYs. SN - 0002-9270 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/12738453/Costs_and_clinical_outcomes_of_primary_prophylaxis_of_variceal_bleeding_in_patients_with_hepatic_cirrhosis:_a_decision_analytic_model_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -