Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop a set of guidelines for referral of children for simple extractions under general anaesthesia and to determine if services providing general anaesthetic extractions comply with the guidelines.
DESIGN
The guidelines were developed with reference to published literature and experts in the field. Patient's records were used to determine the compliance with the guidelines.
SETTING
Community dental services in the North West of England in 2000.
SUBJECTS
One hundred and ninety six sets of patient records of children attending to have teeth extracted under general anaesthesia were studied.
RESULTS
The mean age of the 196 children was 6.8 years (SD = 2.5 years) and ranged from 2.7 to 15.8 years. Caries was the prime reason for extractions (182; 93b). Of the 196 children who received a general anaesthetic, 103 (53%) dentists had complied with the general anaesthetic referral guidelines whilst 93 (47%) had not. There was wide variation in compliance across 11 trusts in the North West of England. The lowest compliance was 25% and the highest 93%.
CONCLUSION
This study has demonstrated that there can be considerable agreement amongst a group of experts on what constitutes clear justification for extracting teeth under general anaesthesia. However there can be marked variation in compliance with these guidelines.
TY - JOUR
T1 - The development of referral guidelines for dentists referring children for extractions under general anaesthesia.
AU - Clayton,M,
AU - Mackie,I C,
PY - 2002/05/02/received
PY - 2002/10/09/accepted
PY - 2003/6/24/pubmed
PY - 2003/9/25/medline
PY - 2003/6/24/entrez
SP - 561-5; discussion 557
JF - British dental journal
JO - Br Dent J
VL - 194
IS - 10
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of guidelines for referral of children for simple extractions under general anaesthesia and to determine if services providing general anaesthetic extractions comply with the guidelines. DESIGN: The guidelines were developed with reference to published literature and experts in the field. Patient's records were used to determine the compliance with the guidelines. SETTING: Community dental services in the North West of England in 2000. SUBJECTS: One hundred and ninety six sets of patient records of children attending to have teeth extracted under general anaesthesia were studied. RESULTS: The mean age of the 196 children was 6.8 years (SD = 2.5 years) and ranged from 2.7 to 15.8 years. Caries was the prime reason for extractions (182; 93b). Of the 196 children who received a general anaesthetic, 103 (53%) dentists had complied with the general anaesthetic referral guidelines whilst 93 (47%) had not. There was wide variation in compliance across 11 trusts in the North West of England. The lowest compliance was 25% and the highest 93%. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that there can be considerable agreement amongst a group of experts on what constitutes clear justification for extracting teeth under general anaesthesia. However there can be marked variation in compliance with these guidelines.
SN - 0007-0610
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/12819731/The_development_of_referral_guidelines_for_dentists_referring_children_for_extractions_under_general_anaesthesia_
L2 - https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810208
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -