Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems.
Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec; 28(6):689-94.OD

Abstract

This study evaluated the marginal adaptation of four different inlay indirect restorative systems: feldspathic ceramic (Duceram LFC-Degussa) and three laboratory-processed resin composites (Solidex-Shofu; Targis-Ivoclar; Artglass-Heraeus Kulzer). Sixty mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) standard cavities were prepared in mandibular molars and divided randomly. Polyvinylsiloxane impressions were made and the restorations were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. Marginal adaptation evaluation was accomplished using an image collector computer system with a digital gauging appliance at four points on the occlusal, proximal and gingival regions with 250x magnification. Among all the materials, the marginal discrepancy recorded on the gingival margins was statistically larger than that recorded on the proximal and occlusal regions. Duceram LFC showed greater marginal discrepancy than Solidex, Artglass and Targis, which showed no statistically significant differences among them.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Operative Dentistry Laboratory, Piracicaba Dental School-State University of Campinas, Brazil. carlosjsoares@umuarama.ufu.brNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

14653281

Citation

Soares, Carlos José, et al. "Marginal Adaptation of Indirect Composites and Ceramic Inlay Systems." Operative Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 6, 2003, pp. 689-94.
Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fernandes Neto AJ, et al. Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems. Oper Dent. 2003;28(6):689-94.
Soares, C. J., Martins, L. R., Fernandes Neto, A. J., & Giannini, M. (2003). Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems. Operative Dentistry, 28(6), 689-94.
Soares CJ, et al. Marginal Adaptation of Indirect Composites and Ceramic Inlay Systems. Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):689-94. PubMed PMID: 14653281.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems. AU - Soares,Carlos José, AU - Martins,Luis Roberto Marcondes, AU - Fernandes Neto,Alfredo Júlio, AU - Giannini,Marcelo, PY - 2003/12/5/pubmed PY - 2004/1/24/medline PY - 2003/12/5/entrez SP - 689 EP - 94 JF - Operative dentistry JO - Oper Dent VL - 28 IS - 6 N2 - This study evaluated the marginal adaptation of four different inlay indirect restorative systems: feldspathic ceramic (Duceram LFC-Degussa) and three laboratory-processed resin composites (Solidex-Shofu; Targis-Ivoclar; Artglass-Heraeus Kulzer). Sixty mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) standard cavities were prepared in mandibular molars and divided randomly. Polyvinylsiloxane impressions were made and the restorations were prepared following the manufacturer's instructions. Marginal adaptation evaluation was accomplished using an image collector computer system with a digital gauging appliance at four points on the occlusal, proximal and gingival regions with 250x magnification. Among all the materials, the marginal discrepancy recorded on the gingival margins was statistically larger than that recorded on the proximal and occlusal regions. Duceram LFC showed greater marginal discrepancy than Solidex, Artglass and Targis, which showed no statistically significant differences among them. SN - 0361-7734 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/14653281/Marginal_adaptation_of_indirect_composites_and_ceramic_inlay_systems_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -