Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria.
Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(1):122-30AJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other functional bowel disorders (FBD) is based on symptom evaluation. Clinical criteria have changed over time, yielding different proportions of subjects fulfilling diagnostic requirements. According to new diagnostic criteria (Rome II), subjects considered some years ago to have IBS no longer do so. The aim of this article is to evaluate how patients diagnosed as having IBS according to original Rome criteria have been split, and to which clinical diagnosis they belong today.

METHODS

Two hundred and eleven subjects meeting original Rome IBS diagnostic criteria were studied: 65 also met Rome II criteria while 146 did not. Subjects were extracted from an epidemiological survey, using home-based personal interviews, on 2000 subjects randomly selected as representative of the Spanish population. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were compared.

RESULTS

Of the subjects meeting original Rome but not Rome II criteria, the present diagnosis should be: 40%"minor" IBS (IBS symptoms of less than 12 wk duration), 37% functional constipation, 12% alternating bowel habit, 7% functional diarrhea, 3% functional abdominal bloating, and 1% unspecified functional bowel disorder (FBD). Thus, 52 subjects (36%) should not be diagnosed with IBS because they really had other FBD, 59 (40%) because of symptoms consistent with IBD diagnosis but not the required duration or frequency, and 35 (24%) because of symptoms consistent with some other FBD diagnosis but not meeting the required duration. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and HRQOL were more severely affected in IBS than in other FBD as a group, and in "major" rather than in "minor" forms.

CONCLUSIONS

Many subjects meeting original Rome criteria for IBS do not meet Rome II criteria: approximately one quarter of subjects do not have sufficient symptom duration or frequency to be diagnosed with IBS and almost half are now considered as having other ("major" or "minor") FBD.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Institute of Functional and Motor Digestive Disorders, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

14687153

Citation

Mearin, Fermin, et al. "Splitting Irritable Bowel Syndrome: From Original Rome to Rome II Criteria." The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 99, no. 1, 2004, pp. 122-30.
Mearin F, Roset M, Badía X, et al. Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):122-30.
Mearin, F., Roset, M., Badía, X., Balboa, A., Baró, E., Ponce, J., ... Talley, N. J. (2004). Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 99(1), pp. 122-30.
Mearin F, et al. Splitting Irritable Bowel Syndrome: From Original Rome to Rome II Criteria. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):122-30. PubMed PMID: 14687153.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria. AU - Mearin,Fermin, AU - Roset,Montse, AU - Badía,Xavier, AU - Balboa,Agustin, AU - Baró,Eva, AU - Ponce,Julio, AU - Díaz-Rubio,Manuel, AU - Caldwell,Ellen, AU - Cucala,Mercedes, AU - Fueyo,Arturo, AU - Talley,Nicholas J, PY - 2003/12/23/pubmed PY - 2004/2/6/medline PY - 2003/12/23/entrez SP - 122 EP - 30 JF - The American journal of gastroenterology JO - Am. J. Gastroenterol. VL - 99 IS - 1 N2 - OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other functional bowel disorders (FBD) is based on symptom evaluation. Clinical criteria have changed over time, yielding different proportions of subjects fulfilling diagnostic requirements. According to new diagnostic criteria (Rome II), subjects considered some years ago to have IBS no longer do so. The aim of this article is to evaluate how patients diagnosed as having IBS according to original Rome criteria have been split, and to which clinical diagnosis they belong today. METHODS: Two hundred and eleven subjects meeting original Rome IBS diagnostic criteria were studied: 65 also met Rome II criteria while 146 did not. Subjects were extracted from an epidemiological survey, using home-based personal interviews, on 2000 subjects randomly selected as representative of the Spanish population. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were compared. RESULTS: Of the subjects meeting original Rome but not Rome II criteria, the present diagnosis should be: 40%"minor" IBS (IBS symptoms of less than 12 wk duration), 37% functional constipation, 12% alternating bowel habit, 7% functional diarrhea, 3% functional abdominal bloating, and 1% unspecified functional bowel disorder (FBD). Thus, 52 subjects (36%) should not be diagnosed with IBS because they really had other FBD, 59 (40%) because of symptoms consistent with IBD diagnosis but not the required duration or frequency, and 35 (24%) because of symptoms consistent with some other FBD diagnosis but not meeting the required duration. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and HRQOL were more severely affected in IBS than in other FBD as a group, and in "major" rather than in "minor" forms. CONCLUSIONS: Many subjects meeting original Rome criteria for IBS do not meet Rome II criteria: approximately one quarter of subjects do not have sufficient symptom duration or frequency to be diagnosed with IBS and almost half are now considered as having other ("major" or "minor") FBD. SN - 0002-9270 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/14687153/Splitting_irritable_bowel_syndrome:_from_original_Rome_to_Rome_II_criteria_ L2 - http://Insights.ovid.com/pubmed?pmid=14687153 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -