Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites.
Syst Biol. 2004 Feb; 53(1):111-9.SB

Abstract

We used phylogenetic analyses of cytochrome b sequences of malaria parasites and their avian hosts to assess the coevolutionary relationships between host and parasite lineages. Many lineages of avian malaria parasites have broad host distributions, which tend to obscure cospeciation events. The hosts of a single parasite or of closely related parasites were nonetheless most frequently recovered from members of the same host taxonomic family, more so than expected by chance. However, global assessments of the relationship between parasite and host phylogenetic trees, using Component and ParaFit, failed to detect significant cospeciation. The event-based approach employed by TreeFitter revealed significant cospeciation and duplication with certain cost assignments for these events, but host switching was consistently more prominent in matching the parasite tree to the host tree. The absence of a global cospeciation signal despite conservative host distribution most likely reflects relatively frequent acquisition of new hosts by individual parasite lineages. Understanding these processes will require a more refined species concept for malaria parasites and more extensive sampling of parasite distributions across hosts. If parasites can disperse between allopatric host populations through alternative hosts, cospeciation may not have a strong influence on the architecture of host-parasite relationships. Rather, parasite speciation may happen more often in conjunction with the acquisition of new hosts followed by divergent selection between host lineages in sympatry. Detailed studies of the phylogeographic distributions of hosts and parasites are needed to characterize these events.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Biology, University of Missouri, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63121-4499, USA. ricklefs@umsl.eduNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Language

eng

PubMed ID

14965906

Citation

Ricklefs, Robert E., et al. "Evolutionary Relationships, Cospeciation, and Host Switching in Avian Malaria Parasites." Systematic Biology, vol. 53, no. 1, 2004, pp. 111-9.
Ricklefs RE, Fallon SM, Bermingham E. Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Syst Biol. 2004;53(1):111-9.
Ricklefs, R. E., Fallon, S. M., & Bermingham, E. (2004). Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Systematic Biology, 53(1), 111-9.
Ricklefs RE, Fallon SM, Bermingham E. Evolutionary Relationships, Cospeciation, and Host Switching in Avian Malaria Parasites. Syst Biol. 2004;53(1):111-9. PubMed PMID: 14965906.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Evolutionary relationships, cospeciation, and host switching in avian malaria parasites. AU - Ricklefs,Robert E, AU - Fallon,Sylvia M, AU - Bermingham,Eldredge, PY - 2004/2/18/pubmed PY - 2004/5/1/medline PY - 2004/2/18/entrez SP - 111 EP - 9 JF - Systematic biology JO - Syst Biol VL - 53 IS - 1 N2 - We used phylogenetic analyses of cytochrome b sequences of malaria parasites and their avian hosts to assess the coevolutionary relationships between host and parasite lineages. Many lineages of avian malaria parasites have broad host distributions, which tend to obscure cospeciation events. The hosts of a single parasite or of closely related parasites were nonetheless most frequently recovered from members of the same host taxonomic family, more so than expected by chance. However, global assessments of the relationship between parasite and host phylogenetic trees, using Component and ParaFit, failed to detect significant cospeciation. The event-based approach employed by TreeFitter revealed significant cospeciation and duplication with certain cost assignments for these events, but host switching was consistently more prominent in matching the parasite tree to the host tree. The absence of a global cospeciation signal despite conservative host distribution most likely reflects relatively frequent acquisition of new hosts by individual parasite lineages. Understanding these processes will require a more refined species concept for malaria parasites and more extensive sampling of parasite distributions across hosts. If parasites can disperse between allopatric host populations through alternative hosts, cospeciation may not have a strong influence on the architecture of host-parasite relationships. Rather, parasite speciation may happen more often in conjunction with the acquisition of new hosts followed by divergent selection between host lineages in sympatry. Detailed studies of the phylogeographic distributions of hosts and parasites are needed to characterize these events. SN - 1063-5157 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/14965906/Evolutionary_relationships_cospeciation_and_host_switching_in_avian_malaria_parasites_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -