Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants.
J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Sep-Dec; 70(3):250-3.JD

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of a compomer and resin sealant in vitro using different surface preparation techniques.

METHODS

Microleakage of a compomer (Dyract Seal, DeTrey) and a resin sealant (Helioseal F, Vivadent) was investigated on 125 intact third molars. Materials and the surface preparation techniques were: Group 1--phosphoric acid (37%)+Helioseal F; Group 2--AlO2 air abrasion+Helioseal F; Group 3--nonrinse conditioner (NRC)+Prime&Bond+Dyract Seal; Group 4--phosphoric acid+Dyract Seal; Group 5--AlO2 air abrasion+Dyract Seal.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with phosphoric acid produced the lowest microleakage scores when applied with compomer and resin fissure sealants and there was no statistical difference (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compomer sealant used with a nonrinse conditioner (NRC) was not as successful as pretreatment with phosphoric acid etching, whereas AlO2 air abrasion pretreatment was ineffective in preventing microleakage in both sealants.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Pedodontics, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. eronatn@dent.ege.edu.trNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

14998210

Citation

Eronat, Nesrin, et al. "Effects of Different Preparation Techniques On the Microleakage of Compomer and Resin Fissure Sealants." Journal of Dentistry for Children (Chicago, Ill.), vol. 70, no. 3, 2003, pp. 250-3.
Eronat N, Bardakçi Y, Sipahi M. Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003;70(3):250-3.
Eronat, N., Bardakçi, Y., & Sipahi, M. (2003). Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants. Journal of Dentistry for Children (Chicago, Ill.), 70(3), 250-3.
Eronat N, Bardakçi Y, Sipahi M. Effects of Different Preparation Techniques On the Microleakage of Compomer and Resin Fissure Sealants. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 Sep-Dec;70(3):250-3. PubMed PMID: 14998210.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants. AU - Eronat,Nesrin, AU - Bardakçi,Yener, AU - Sipahi,Makbule, PY - 2004/3/5/pubmed PY - 2004/3/26/medline PY - 2004/3/5/entrez SP - 250 EP - 3 JF - Journal of dentistry for children (Chicago, Ill.) JO - J Dent Child (Chic) VL - 70 IS - 3 N2 - PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of a compomer and resin sealant in vitro using different surface preparation techniques. METHODS: Microleakage of a compomer (Dyract Seal, DeTrey) and a resin sealant (Helioseal F, Vivadent) was investigated on 125 intact third molars. Materials and the surface preparation techniques were: Group 1--phosphoric acid (37%)+Helioseal F; Group 2--AlO2 air abrasion+Helioseal F; Group 3--nonrinse conditioner (NRC)+Prime&Bond+Dyract Seal; Group 4--phosphoric acid+Dyract Seal; Group 5--AlO2 air abrasion+Dyract Seal. RESULTS: Pretreatment with phosphoric acid produced the lowest microleakage scores when applied with compomer and resin fissure sealants and there was no statistical difference (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compomer sealant used with a nonrinse conditioner (NRC) was not as successful as pretreatment with phosphoric acid etching, whereas AlO2 air abrasion pretreatment was ineffective in preventing microleakage in both sealants. SN - 1551-8949 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/14998210/Effects_of_different_preparation_techniques_on_the_microleakage_of_compomer_and_resin_fissure_sealants_ L2 - https://www.ingentaconnect.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1551-8949&volume=70&issue=3&spage=250&aulast=Eronat DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -