Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Limitations to successful investigation and reporting of foodborne outbreaks: an analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in FoodNet catchment areas, 1998-1999.
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 15; 38 Suppl 3:S297-302.CI

Abstract

To better understand factors associated with confirming the etiologic organism and identifying the food vehicle responsible for foodborne-disease outbreaks, we examined data from outbreaks reported in 1998 and 1999 through active surveillance by Foodborne Disease Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) surveillance areas in 7 states. In 71% of these outbreaks, no confirmed etiology was identified, and in 46%, no suspected food vehicle was identified. Outbreaks involving > or =10 cases were significantly more likely to have their etiology identified than were smaller outbreaks. In two-thirds of outbreaks in which an etiology was not confirmed, no stool specimens were collected for laboratory testing; in 55% of these outbreaks, neither clinical specimens nor food samples were tested. If the etiology of and factors contributing to foodborne-disease outbreaks are to be understood, adequate resources must be available to allow specimens to be collected and tested and epidemiologic investigations to be conducted appropriately.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Communicable and Environmental Disease Services, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, TN 37247, USA. tim.f.jones@state.tn.usNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15095202

Citation

Jones, Timothy F., et al. "Limitations to Successful Investigation and Reporting of Foodborne Outbreaks: an Analysis of Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in FoodNet Catchment Areas, 1998-1999." Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol. 38 Suppl 3, 2004, pp. S297-302.
Jones TF, Imhoff B, Samuel M, et al. Limitations to successful investigation and reporting of foodborne outbreaks: an analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in FoodNet catchment areas, 1998-1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38 Suppl 3:S297-302.
Jones, T. F., Imhoff, B., Samuel, M., Mshar, P., McCombs, K. G., Hawkins, M., Deneen, V., Cambridge, M., & Olsen, S. J. (2004). Limitations to successful investigation and reporting of foodborne outbreaks: an analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in FoodNet catchment areas, 1998-1999. Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 38 Suppl 3, S297-302.
Jones TF, et al. Limitations to Successful Investigation and Reporting of Foodborne Outbreaks: an Analysis of Foodborne Disease Outbreaks in FoodNet Catchment Areas, 1998-1999. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Apr 15;38 Suppl 3:S297-302. PubMed PMID: 15095202.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Limitations to successful investigation and reporting of foodborne outbreaks: an analysis of foodborne disease outbreaks in FoodNet catchment areas, 1998-1999. AU - Jones,Timothy F, AU - Imhoff,Beth, AU - Samuel,Michael, AU - Mshar,Patricia, AU - McCombs,Katherine Gibbs, AU - Hawkins,Marguerite, AU - Deneen,Valerie, AU - Cambridge,Michael, AU - Olsen,Sonja J, AU - ,, PY - 2004/4/20/pubmed PY - 2004/4/29/medline PY - 2004/4/20/entrez SP - S297 EP - 302 JF - Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America JO - Clin Infect Dis VL - 38 Suppl 3 N2 - To better understand factors associated with confirming the etiologic organism and identifying the food vehicle responsible for foodborne-disease outbreaks, we examined data from outbreaks reported in 1998 and 1999 through active surveillance by Foodborne Disease Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) surveillance areas in 7 states. In 71% of these outbreaks, no confirmed etiology was identified, and in 46%, no suspected food vehicle was identified. Outbreaks involving > or =10 cases were significantly more likely to have their etiology identified than were smaller outbreaks. In two-thirds of outbreaks in which an etiology was not confirmed, no stool specimens were collected for laboratory testing; in 55% of these outbreaks, neither clinical specimens nor food samples were tested. If the etiology of and factors contributing to foodborne-disease outbreaks are to be understood, adequate resources must be available to allow specimens to be collected and tested and epidemiologic investigations to be conducted appropriately. SN - 1537-6591 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15095202/Limitations_to_successful_investigation_and_reporting_of_foodborne_outbreaks:_an_analysis_of_foodborne_disease_outbreaks_in_FoodNet_catchment_areas_1998_1999_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -