Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Gastrointestinal adverse reactions following anthrax vaccination: an analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun; 51(57):762-7.H

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States Academy of Sciences in 2000 encouraged the evaluation of active long-term monitoring studies of large populations to further evaluate the relative safety of anthrax vaccine. Anthrax is a deadly bacterial infectious disease that currently has been engineered as a biological warfare agent. The vaccine produced against anthrax is a cell-free crude culture of the various toxin components of the natural disease. The U.S. military current goal is to vaccinate its entire personnel by 2003. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anthrax vaccination and its association with arthritic, immunological and gastrointestinal adverse reactions based upon analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.

METHODOLOGY

We analyzed the VAERS database from 15 December 1997 to 12 April 2000. We also compared the incidence of anthrax adverse reactions with the incidence of adverse reactions reported to VAERS after adult tetanus vaccination.

RESULTS

Anthrax vaccine was one of the most reactogenic vaccines included in VAERS. The incidence of adverse reactions reported following anthrax vaccine was higher for every reaction analyzed in comparison to the adult vaccine control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current anthrax vaccine may be acceptable in military populations in impending threat of anthrax exposure, the cost-benefits of vaccination in less high risk military populations may be more questionable. Civilian anthrax vaccination will require a less reactogenic vaccine. Civilian doctors should be aware of anthrax vaccine adverse reactions. Military and civilian doctors should also be diligent in their reporting to VAERS of cases of adverse reactions to anthrax vaccine.

Authors+Show Affiliations

The Genetic Centers of America, Silver Spring, MD, USA. mgeier@erols.comNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15143911

Citation

Geier, Mark R., and David A. Geier. "Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions Following Anthrax Vaccination: an Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Database." Hepato-gastroenterology, vol. 51, no. 57, 2004, pp. 762-7.
Geier MR, Geier DA. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions following anthrax vaccination: an analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51(57):762-7.
Geier, M. R., & Geier, D. A. (2004). Gastrointestinal adverse reactions following anthrax vaccination: an analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database. Hepato-gastroenterology, 51(57), 762-7.
Geier MR, Geier DA. Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions Following Anthrax Vaccination: an Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) Database. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):762-7. PubMed PMID: 15143911.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Gastrointestinal adverse reactions following anthrax vaccination: an analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database. AU - Geier,Mark R, AU - Geier,David A, PY - 2004/5/18/pubmed PY - 2004/7/28/medline PY - 2004/5/18/entrez SP - 762 EP - 7 JF - Hepato-gastroenterology JO - Hepatogastroenterology VL - 51 IS - 57 N2 - BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the United States Academy of Sciences in 2000 encouraged the evaluation of active long-term monitoring studies of large populations to further evaluate the relative safety of anthrax vaccine. Anthrax is a deadly bacterial infectious disease that currently has been engineered as a biological warfare agent. The vaccine produced against anthrax is a cell-free crude culture of the various toxin components of the natural disease. The U.S. military current goal is to vaccinate its entire personnel by 2003. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anthrax vaccination and its association with arthritic, immunological and gastrointestinal adverse reactions based upon analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed the VAERS database from 15 December 1997 to 12 April 2000. We also compared the incidence of anthrax adverse reactions with the incidence of adverse reactions reported to VAERS after adult tetanus vaccination. RESULTS: Anthrax vaccine was one of the most reactogenic vaccines included in VAERS. The incidence of adverse reactions reported following anthrax vaccine was higher for every reaction analyzed in comparison to the adult vaccine control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The current anthrax vaccine may be acceptable in military populations in impending threat of anthrax exposure, the cost-benefits of vaccination in less high risk military populations may be more questionable. Civilian anthrax vaccination will require a less reactogenic vaccine. Civilian doctors should be aware of anthrax vaccine adverse reactions. Military and civilian doctors should also be diligent in their reporting to VAERS of cases of adverse reactions to anthrax vaccine. SN - 0172-6390 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15143911/Gastrointestinal_adverse_reactions_following_anthrax_vaccination:_an_analysis_of_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System__VAERS__database_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -