Abstract
PURPOSE
Implementing problem-based learning (PBL) in the clinical years of a medical degree presents particular challenges. This study investigated the effectiveness of using an online Clinical Reasoning Guide to assist integration of PBL in the clinical setting and promote further development of students' clinical reasoning abilities.
METHOD
A total of 52 students in 6 PBL groups, together with their 6 clinical tutors, participated in the study. Data were analysed from videotaped observations of tutorial activity and follow-up, semistructured interviews.
RESULTS
From both the student facilitators' and the clinical tutors' perspectives, the Guide proved an effective tool for augmenting the PBL process in clinical settings and promoting the development of clinical reasoning. By combining computer-aided learning with collaborative PBL tutorials it promoted individual as well as collaborative reasoning. There is also evidence to suggest that the Guide prompted students to look more critically at their own, their colleagues' and other clinicians' reasoning processes.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting the problem-based learning process in the clinical years: evaluation of an online Clinical Reasoning Guide.
AU - Ryan,Greg,
AU - Dolling,Terry,
AU - Barnet,Stewart,
PY - 2004/6/11/pubmed
PY - 2004/7/9/medline
PY - 2004/6/11/entrez
SP - 638
EP - 45
JF - Medical education
JO - Med Educ
VL - 38
IS - 6
N2 - PURPOSE: Implementing problem-based learning (PBL) in the clinical years of a medical degree presents particular challenges. This study investigated the effectiveness of using an online Clinical Reasoning Guide to assist integration of PBL in the clinical setting and promote further development of students' clinical reasoning abilities. METHOD: A total of 52 students in 6 PBL groups, together with their 6 clinical tutors, participated in the study. Data were analysed from videotaped observations of tutorial activity and follow-up, semistructured interviews. RESULTS: From both the student facilitators' and the clinical tutors' perspectives, the Guide proved an effective tool for augmenting the PBL process in clinical settings and promoting the development of clinical reasoning. By combining computer-aided learning with collaborative PBL tutorials it promoted individual as well as collaborative reasoning. There is also evidence to suggest that the Guide prompted students to look more critically at their own, their colleagues' and other clinicians' reasoning processes.
SN - 0308-0110
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15189260/Supporting_the_problem_based_learning_process_in_the_clinical_years:_evaluation_of_an_online_Clinical_Reasoning_Guide_
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -