Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments.
Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Jan-Feb; 5(1):59-67.IJ

Abstract

Retainers for composite retained prostheses ("Maryland bridges") have traditionally relied upon an etched base metal alloy for micromechanical retention. This study compared the tensile bond strength of three resin cements using two alloy surface treatments. Rexillium III and Olympia disks were cast, oxidized, and given simulated porcelain firings. Paired specimens were cemented with Comspan, Panavia EX, or C & B Metabond after air abrasion with aluminum oxide or silicoating. Air-abraded Olympia disks were tin plated prior to luting with Panavia EX. Electrolytically etched Rexillium III specimens luted with Comspan served as controls. Specimens were thermocycled and tested in tension. Highest tensile bond strengths were achieved with: (1) Olympia specimens, where the bonding surface was air abraded but tin plated before cementation with Panavia EX, and (2) Rexillium III specimens, where the bonding surface was air abraded or silicoated and the disks were cemented with C & B Metabond.

Authors+Show Affiliations

USAF Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

1520445

Citation

Imbery, T A., et al. "Tensile Strength of Three Resin Cements Following Two Alloy Surface Treatments." The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 5, no. 1, 1992, pp. 59-67.
Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Naylor WP. Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5(1):59-67.
Imbery, T. A., Burgess, J. O., & Naylor, W. P. (1992). Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 5(1), 59-67.
Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Naylor WP. Tensile Strength of Three Resin Cements Following Two Alloy Surface Treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Jan-Feb;5(1):59-67. PubMed PMID: 1520445.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments. AU - Imbery,T A, AU - Burgess,J O, AU - Naylor,W P, PY - 1992/1/1/pubmed PY - 1992/1/1/medline PY - 1992/1/1/entrez SP - 59 EP - 67 JF - The International journal of prosthodontics JO - Int J Prosthodont VL - 5 IS - 1 N2 - Retainers for composite retained prostheses ("Maryland bridges") have traditionally relied upon an etched base metal alloy for micromechanical retention. This study compared the tensile bond strength of three resin cements using two alloy surface treatments. Rexillium III and Olympia disks were cast, oxidized, and given simulated porcelain firings. Paired specimens were cemented with Comspan, Panavia EX, or C & B Metabond after air abrasion with aluminum oxide or silicoating. Air-abraded Olympia disks were tin plated prior to luting with Panavia EX. Electrolytically etched Rexillium III specimens luted with Comspan served as controls. Specimens were thermocycled and tested in tension. Highest tensile bond strengths were achieved with: (1) Olympia specimens, where the bonding surface was air abraded but tin plated before cementation with Panavia EX, and (2) Rexillium III specimens, where the bonding surface was air abraded or silicoated and the disks were cemented with C & B Metabond. SN - 0893-2174 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/1520445/Tensile_strength_of_three_resin_cements_following_two_alloy_surface_treatments_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -