Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A comparison of irritable bowel syndrome patients managed in primary and secondary care: the Episode IBS study.
Br J Gen Pract 2004; 54(504):503-7BJ

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is thought that people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) who consult secondary care have more severe symptomatology than those treated mainly in primary care.

AIMS

To describe the physical and psychological symptoms of IBS, and the health-related quality of life of patients managed in primary and secondary care.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Cross-sectional observational survey.

SETTING

The general population of the United Kingdom (UK).

METHODS

A cohort of people with IBS symptoms was recruited via a UK-wide newspaper advertisement. Frequency, duration and severity of symptoms, and health-related quality of life data were collected by semi-structured telephone interviews. Descriptive analysis allowed the comparison of those managed in primary care with those consulting secondary care. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patients consulting secondary care.

RESULTS

Data on 486 participants with confirmed IBS (Rome II criteria) were examined. Similar patterns in symptom severity were found in primary and secondary care groups. Factors associated with IBS patients consulting secondary care were: male sex, a longer length of time since diagnosis, having frequent bowel motions, not having dyspepsia in the past 3 months, and having used medication and alternative therapies. Although patients managed in secondary care have greater impairment to their usual activities, both groups had similar health-related quality-of-life profiles.

CONCLUSION

High levels of physical and psychological morbidity were present in population-based volunteers managed in both primary and secondary care. This study suggests that patients with IBS managed solely in primary care are affected as much as those attending secondary care.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Centre for Mathematics and Statistics, Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland. graeme.smith@ed.ac.ukNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15239911

Citation

Smith, Graeme D., et al. "A Comparison of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients Managed in Primary and Secondary Care: the Episode IBS Study." The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, vol. 54, no. 504, 2004, pp. 503-7.
Smith GD, Steinke DT, Kinnear M, et al. A comparison of irritable bowel syndrome patients managed in primary and secondary care: the Episode IBS study. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54(504):503-7.
Smith, G. D., Steinke, D. T., Kinnear, M., Penny, K. I., Pathmanathan, N., & Penman, I. D. (2004). A comparison of irritable bowel syndrome patients managed in primary and secondary care: the Episode IBS study. The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 54(504), pp. 503-7.
Smith GD, et al. A Comparison of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients Managed in Primary and Secondary Care: the Episode IBS Study. Br J Gen Pract. 2004;54(504):503-7. PubMed PMID: 15239911.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A comparison of irritable bowel syndrome patients managed in primary and secondary care: the Episode IBS study. AU - Smith,Graeme D, AU - Steinke,Douglas T, AU - Kinnear,Moira, AU - Penny,Kay I, AU - Pathmanathan,Nim, AU - Penman,Ian D, AU - ,, PY - 2004/7/9/pubmed PY - 2004/10/19/medline PY - 2004/7/9/entrez SP - 503 EP - 7 JF - The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners JO - Br J Gen Pract VL - 54 IS - 504 N2 - BACKGROUND: It is thought that people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) who consult secondary care have more severe symptomatology than those treated mainly in primary care. AIMS: To describe the physical and psychological symptoms of IBS, and the health-related quality of life of patients managed in primary and secondary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional observational survey. SETTING: The general population of the United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: A cohort of people with IBS symptoms was recruited via a UK-wide newspaper advertisement. Frequency, duration and severity of symptoms, and health-related quality of life data were collected by semi-structured telephone interviews. Descriptive analysis allowed the comparison of those managed in primary care with those consulting secondary care. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patients consulting secondary care. RESULTS: Data on 486 participants with confirmed IBS (Rome II criteria) were examined. Similar patterns in symptom severity were found in primary and secondary care groups. Factors associated with IBS patients consulting secondary care were: male sex, a longer length of time since diagnosis, having frequent bowel motions, not having dyspepsia in the past 3 months, and having used medication and alternative therapies. Although patients managed in secondary care have greater impairment to their usual activities, both groups had similar health-related quality-of-life profiles. CONCLUSION: High levels of physical and psychological morbidity were present in population-based volunteers managed in both primary and secondary care. This study suggests that patients with IBS managed solely in primary care are affected as much as those attending secondary care. SN - 0960-1643 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15239911/A_comparison_of_irritable_bowel_syndrome_patients_managed_in_primary_and_secondary_care:_the_Episode_IBS_study_ L2 - http://bjgp.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=15239911 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -