Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan; 160(1):71-8.EB

Abstract

Over the past decade there has been a great deal of controversy regarding the relative impact of visual illusions on cognitive judgments and the control of goal-directed action. We report the results of two experiments indicating that perceptual biases associated with the Müller-Lyer illusion involve a misjudgment of amplitude/extent while aiming biases involve error in the specification of a movement endpoint. This dissociation of perception and action is consistent with some aspects of Milner and Goodale's two visual system model, but not others.

Links

Publisher Full Text
Aggregator Full Text

Authors+Show Affiliations

Glazebrook CM
Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Dhillon VP
No affiliation info available
Keetch KM
No affiliation info available
Lyons J
No affiliation info available
Amazeen E
No affiliation info available
Weeks DJ
No affiliation info available
Elliott D
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AdultBiasBrainCognitionExtremitiesFemaleHumansIllusionsMaleModels, NeurologicalMovementNeuropsychological TestsOrientationPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual Pathways

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15300347

Citation

Glazebrook, Cheryl M., et al. "Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer Illusion: Amplitude or Endpoint Bias?" Experimental Brain Research, vol. 160, no. 1, 2005, pp. 71-8.
Glazebrook CM, Dhillon VP, Keetch KM, et al. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias? Exp Brain Res. 2005;160(1):71-8.
Glazebrook, C. M., Dhillon, V. P., Keetch, K. M., Lyons, J., Amazeen, E., Weeks, D. J., & Elliott, D. (2005). Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias? Experimental Brain Research, 160(1), 71-8.
Glazebrook CM, et al. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer Illusion: Amplitude or Endpoint Bias. Exp Brain Res. 2005;160(1):71-8. PubMed PMID: 15300347.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias? AU - Glazebrook,Cheryl M, AU - Dhillon,Victoria P, AU - Keetch,Katherine M, AU - Lyons,James, AU - Amazeen,Eric, AU - Weeks,Daniel J, AU - Elliott,Digby, PY - 2004/8/10/pubmed PY - 2005/8/19/medline PY - 2004/8/10/entrez SP - 71 EP - 8 JF - Experimental brain research JO - Exp Brain Res VL - 160 IS - 1 N2 - Over the past decade there has been a great deal of controversy regarding the relative impact of visual illusions on cognitive judgments and the control of goal-directed action. We report the results of two experiments indicating that perceptual biases associated with the Müller-Lyer illusion involve a misjudgment of amplitude/extent while aiming biases involve error in the specification of a movement endpoint. This dissociation of perception and action is consistent with some aspects of Milner and Goodale's two visual system model, but not others. SN - 0014-4819 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15300347/Perception_action_and_the_Müller_Lyer_illusion:_amplitude_or_endpoint_bias L2 - https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-1986-y DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -