Citation
Raviele, Antonio, et al. "A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Permanent Cardiac Pacing for the Treatment of Recurrent Tilt-induced Vasovagal Syncope. the Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial (SYNPACE)." European Heart Journal, vol. 25, no. 19, 2004, pp. 1741-8.
Raviele A, Giada F, Menozzi C, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE). Eur Heart J. 2004;25(19):1741-8.
Raviele, A., Giada, F., Menozzi, C., Speca, G., Orazi, S., Gasparini, G., Sutton, R., & Brignole, M. (2004). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE). European Heart Journal, 25(19), 1741-8.
Raviele A, et al. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Permanent Cardiac Pacing for the Treatment of Recurrent Tilt-induced Vasovagal Syncope. the Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial (SYNPACE). Eur Heart J. 2004;25(19):1741-8. PubMed PMID: 15451153.
TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE).
AU - Raviele,Antonio,
AU - Giada,Franco,
AU - Menozzi,Carlo,
AU - Speca,Giancarlo,
AU - Orazi,Serafino,
AU - Gasparini,Gianni,
AU - Sutton,Richard,
AU - Brignole,Michele,
AU - ,,
PY - 2004/04/04/received
PY - 2004/05/30/revised
PY - 2004/06/17/accepted
PY - 2004/9/29/pubmed
PY - 2005/2/25/medline
PY - 2004/9/29/entrez
SP - 1741
EP - 8
JF - European heart journal
JO - Eur Heart J
VL - 25
IS - 19
N2 - AIMS: Recently, some studies revealed the efficacy of pacemaker implantation in decreasing recurrences in patients with vasovagal syncope. As these studies were not blinded or placebo-controlled, the benefits observed might have been due to a bias in the assessment of outcomes or to a placebo effect of the pacemaker. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in order to ascertain if pacing therapy reduces the risk of syncope relapse. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (53 +/- 16 years; 19 women) with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope (median 12 syncopes in the lifetime) and 1 syncopal relapse after head-up tilt testing underwent implantation of a pacemaker, and were randomized to pacemaker ON or to pacemaker OFF. During a median of 715 days of follow-up, 8 (50%) patients randomized to pacemaker ON had recurrence of syncope compared to 5 (38%) of patients randomized to pacemaker OFF (p = n.s.); the median time to first syncope was longer in the pacemaker ON than in pacemaker OFF group, although not significantly so (97 [38-144] vs 20 [4-302] days; p = 0.38). There was also no significant difference in the subgroups of patients who had had a mixed response and in those who had had an asystolic response during head-up tilt testing. CONCLUSION: Our data were unable to show a superiority of active pacing versus inactive pacing in preventing syncopal recurrence in patients with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope.
SN - 0195-668X
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15451153/A_randomized_double_blind_placebo_controlled_study_of_permanent_cardiac_pacing_for_the_treatment_of_recurrent_tilt_induced_vasovagal_syncope__The_vasovagal_syncope_and_pacing_trial__SYNPACE__
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -