Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE).
Eur Heart J. 2004 Oct; 25(19):1741-8.EH

Abstract

AIMS

Recently, some studies revealed the efficacy of pacemaker implantation in decreasing recurrences in patients with vasovagal syncope. As these studies were not blinded or placebo-controlled, the benefits observed might have been due to a bias in the assessment of outcomes or to a placebo effect of the pacemaker. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in order to ascertain if pacing therapy reduces the risk of syncope relapse.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (53 +/- 16 years; 19 women) with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope (median 12 syncopes in the lifetime) and 1 syncopal relapse after head-up tilt testing underwent implantation of a pacemaker, and were randomized to pacemaker ON or to pacemaker OFF. During a median of 715 days of follow-up, 8 (50%) patients randomized to pacemaker ON had recurrence of syncope compared to 5 (38%) of patients randomized to pacemaker OFF (p = n.s.); the median time to first syncope was longer in the pacemaker ON than in pacemaker OFF group, although not significantly so (97 [38-144] vs 20 [4-302] days; p = 0.38). There was also no significant difference in the subgroups of patients who had had a mixed response and in those who had had an asystolic response during head-up tilt testing.

CONCLUSION

Our data were unable to show a superiority of active pacing versus inactive pacing in preventing syncopal recurrence in patients with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Umberto I, Via Circonvallazione 50, 30174 Mestre-Venice, Italy. araviele@tin.itNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15451153

Citation

Raviele, Antonio, et al. "A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Permanent Cardiac Pacing for the Treatment of Recurrent Tilt-induced Vasovagal Syncope. the Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial (SYNPACE)." European Heart Journal, vol. 25, no. 19, 2004, pp. 1741-8.
Raviele A, Giada F, Menozzi C, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE). Eur Heart J. 2004;25(19):1741-8.
Raviele, A., Giada, F., Menozzi, C., Speca, G., Orazi, S., Gasparini, G., Sutton, R., & Brignole, M. (2004). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE). European Heart Journal, 25(19), 1741-8.
Raviele A, et al. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Permanent Cardiac Pacing for the Treatment of Recurrent Tilt-induced Vasovagal Syncope. the Vasovagal Syncope and Pacing Trial (SYNPACE). Eur Heart J. 2004;25(19):1741-8. PubMed PMID: 15451153.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of permanent cardiac pacing for the treatment of recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. The vasovagal syncope and pacing trial (SYNPACE). AU - Raviele,Antonio, AU - Giada,Franco, AU - Menozzi,Carlo, AU - Speca,Giancarlo, AU - Orazi,Serafino, AU - Gasparini,Gianni, AU - Sutton,Richard, AU - Brignole,Michele, AU - ,, PY - 2004/04/04/received PY - 2004/05/30/revised PY - 2004/06/17/accepted PY - 2004/9/29/pubmed PY - 2005/2/25/medline PY - 2004/9/29/entrez SP - 1741 EP - 8 JF - European heart journal JO - Eur Heart J VL - 25 IS - 19 N2 - AIMS: Recently, some studies revealed the efficacy of pacemaker implantation in decreasing recurrences in patients with vasovagal syncope. As these studies were not blinded or placebo-controlled, the benefits observed might have been due to a bias in the assessment of outcomes or to a placebo effect of the pacemaker. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in order to ascertain if pacing therapy reduces the risk of syncope relapse. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (53 +/- 16 years; 19 women) with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope (median 12 syncopes in the lifetime) and 1 syncopal relapse after head-up tilt testing underwent implantation of a pacemaker, and were randomized to pacemaker ON or to pacemaker OFF. During a median of 715 days of follow-up, 8 (50%) patients randomized to pacemaker ON had recurrence of syncope compared to 5 (38%) of patients randomized to pacemaker OFF (p = n.s.); the median time to first syncope was longer in the pacemaker ON than in pacemaker OFF group, although not significantly so (97 [38-144] vs 20 [4-302] days; p = 0.38). There was also no significant difference in the subgroups of patients who had had a mixed response and in those who had had an asystolic response during head-up tilt testing. CONCLUSION: Our data were unable to show a superiority of active pacing versus inactive pacing in preventing syncopal recurrence in patients with severe recurrent tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. SN - 0195-668X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15451153/A_randomized_double_blind_placebo_controlled_study_of_permanent_cardiac_pacing_for_the_treatment_of_recurrent_tilt_induced_vasovagal_syncope__The_vasovagal_syncope_and_pacing_trial__SYNPACE__ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -