Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: new directions for research, policy, and practice.
J Interpers Violence. 2005 Feb; 20(2):155-66.JI

Abstract

The development of empirically based behavioral and psychological typologies provides clear evidence that offenders vary across types. A review and synthesis of the literature reveals three types of batterers common across current typology research-a low, moderate, and high-risk offender. Examination of these types demonstrates that most male offenders do not escalate over time from low to high levels of risk. This observation refutes previous claims regarding a common consensus among researchers that battering escalates in frequency and intensity over time. There are particular characteristics specific to each type that establish thresholds distinct to each classification. Thus, it is unlikely that an offender will move from one type to another. Interventions targeted to address the needs of subsamples of offenders can lead to more effectively protecting those most at risk for future violence. Addressing the issue of woman battering through the prism of typologies has significant implications for research, policy, and practice.

Authors+Show Affiliations

School of Social Work & Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania, 3701 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. mcavanau@ssw.upenn.eduNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Review

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15601787

Citation

Cavanaugh, Mary M., and Richard J. Gelles. "The Utility of Male Domestic Violence Offender Typologies: New Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice." Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 20, no. 2, 2005, pp. 155-66.
Cavanaugh MM, Gelles RJ. The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: new directions for research, policy, and practice. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(2):155-66.
Cavanaugh, M. M., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: new directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 155-66.
Cavanaugh MM, Gelles RJ. The Utility of Male Domestic Violence Offender Typologies: New Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(2):155-66. PubMed PMID: 15601787.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: new directions for research, policy, and practice. AU - Cavanaugh,Mary M, AU - Gelles,Richard J, PY - 2004/12/17/pubmed PY - 2005/4/27/medline PY - 2004/12/17/entrez SP - 155 EP - 66 JF - Journal of interpersonal violence JO - J Interpers Violence VL - 20 IS - 2 N2 - The development of empirically based behavioral and psychological typologies provides clear evidence that offenders vary across types. A review and synthesis of the literature reveals three types of batterers common across current typology research-a low, moderate, and high-risk offender. Examination of these types demonstrates that most male offenders do not escalate over time from low to high levels of risk. This observation refutes previous claims regarding a common consensus among researchers that battering escalates in frequency and intensity over time. There are particular characteristics specific to each type that establish thresholds distinct to each classification. Thus, it is unlikely that an offender will move from one type to another. Interventions targeted to address the needs of subsamples of offenders can lead to more effectively protecting those most at risk for future violence. Addressing the issue of woman battering through the prism of typologies has significant implications for research, policy, and practice. SN - 0886-2605 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15601787/The_utility_of_male_domestic_violence_offender_typologies:_new_directions_for_research_policy_and_practice_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -