Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jan; 42(1):69-77.CP

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare craniofacial morphology and nasolabial appearance up to age 17 in individuals with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at five European centers.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe.

SUBJECTS

127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired complete UCLP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cephalometric variables, 14 angular and 2 ratio variables, and panel ratings of nasolabial appearance, 4 variables.

RESULTS

The results revealed that at ages 12 and 17, two centers had a flatter profile (gs-sn-pgs) and retrognathic maxilla (sss-ns-sms). Additionally, one of the two centers had increased lower face height. Ratings of nasolabial appearance showed more similarity between the centers.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm that systematic differences in craniofacial morphology and nasolabial appearance may occur between different cleft centers, but do not allow specific caused factors to be identified.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Orthodontic Department, Eastman Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. viveca.brattstrom@ftv.sll.seNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15643918

Citation

Brattström, Viveca, et al. "The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients With Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 2: Craniofacial Form and Nasolabial Appearance." The Cleft Palate-craniofacial Journal : Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, vol. 42, no. 1, 2005, pp. 69-77.
Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, et al. The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):69-77.
Brattström, V., Mølsted, K., Prahl-Andersen, B., Semb, G., & Shaw, W. C. (2005). The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. The Cleft Palate-craniofacial Journal : Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, 42(1), 69-77.
Brattström V, et al. The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients With Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 2: Craniofacial Form and Nasolabial Appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):69-77. PubMed PMID: 15643918.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. AU - Brattström,Viveca, AU - Mølsted,Kirsten, AU - Prahl-Andersen,Birte, AU - Semb,Gunvor, AU - Shaw,William C, PY - 2005/1/13/pubmed PY - 2006/1/5/medline PY - 2005/1/13/entrez SP - 69 EP - 77 JF - The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association JO - Cleft Palate Craniofac J VL - 42 IS - 1 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare craniofacial morphology and nasolabial appearance up to age 17 in individuals with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at five European centers. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. SUBJECTS: 127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired complete UCLP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cephalometric variables, 14 angular and 2 ratio variables, and panel ratings of nasolabial appearance, 4 variables. RESULTS: The results revealed that at ages 12 and 17, two centers had a flatter profile (gs-sn-pgs) and retrognathic maxilla (sss-ns-sms). Additionally, one of the two centers had increased lower face height. Ratings of nasolabial appearance showed more similarity between the centers. CONCLUSION: The results confirm that systematic differences in craniofacial morphology and nasolabial appearance may occur between different cleft centers, but do not allow specific caused factors to be identified. SN - 1055-6656 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15643918/The_Eurocleft_study:_intercenter_study_of_treatment_outcome_in_patients_with_complete_cleft_lip_and_palate__Part_2:_craniofacial_form_and_nasolabial_appearance_ L2 - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/02-119.2.1?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub=pubmed DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -