Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Molecular systematics of Eumolpinae and the relationships with Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae).
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Mar; 34(3):584-600.MP

Abstract

The 3400 species of Eumolpinae constitute one of the largest subfamilies of leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae). Their systematics is still largely based on late 19th century monographs and remains highly unsatisfactory. Only recently, some plesiomorphic lineages have been split out as separate subfamilies, including the southern hemisphere Spilopyrinae and the ambiguously placed Synetinae. Here we provide insight into the internal systematics of the Eumolpinae based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of three ribosomal genes, including partial mitochondrial 16S and nuclear 28S and complete nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences. Sixteen morphological characters considered important in the higher-level systematics of Eumolpinae were also included in a combined analysis with the molecular characters. All phylogenetic analyses were performed using parsimony by optimizing length variation directly on the tree, as implemented in the POY software. The data support the monophyly of the Spilopyrinae outside the clade including all sampled Eumolpinae, corroborating their treatment as a separate subfamily within the Chrysomelidae. The systematic placement of the Synetinae remains ambiguous but consistent with considering it a different subfamily as well, since the phylogenetic analyses using all the available evidence show the representative sequence of the subfamily also unrelated to the Eumolpinae. The Megascelini, traditionally considered a separate subfamily, falls within the Eumolpinae. Several recognized taxonomic groupings within Eumolpinae, including the tribes Adoxini or Typophorini, are not confirmed by molecular data; others like Eumolpini seem well supported. Among the morphological characters analyzed, the presence of a characteristic groove on the pygidium (a synapomorphy of the Eumolpini) and the shape of tarsal claws (simple, appendiculate or bifid) stand out as potentially useful characters for taxonomic classification in the Eumolpinae.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. jgzurita@um.esNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15683931

Citation

Gómez-Zurita, Jesús, et al. "Molecular Systematics of Eumolpinae and the Relationships With Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)." Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 34, no. 3, 2005, pp. 584-600.
Gómez-Zurita J, Jolivet P, Vogler AP. Molecular systematics of Eumolpinae and the relationships with Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005;34(3):584-600.
Gómez-Zurita, J., Jolivet, P., & Vogler, A. P. (2005). Molecular systematics of Eumolpinae and the relationships with Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 34(3), 584-600.
Gómez-Zurita J, Jolivet P, Vogler AP. Molecular Systematics of Eumolpinae and the Relationships With Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005;34(3):584-600. PubMed PMID: 15683931.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Molecular systematics of Eumolpinae and the relationships with Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). AU - Gómez-Zurita,Jesús, AU - Jolivet,Pierre, AU - Vogler,Alfried P, Y1 - 2005/01/08/ PY - 2004/04/05/received PY - 2004/11/08/revised PY - 2004/11/30/accepted PY - 2005/2/3/pubmed PY - 2005/6/17/medline PY - 2005/2/3/entrez SP - 584 EP - 600 JF - Molecular phylogenetics and evolution JO - Mol Phylogenet Evol VL - 34 IS - 3 N2 - The 3400 species of Eumolpinae constitute one of the largest subfamilies of leaf beetles (Chrysomelidae). Their systematics is still largely based on late 19th century monographs and remains highly unsatisfactory. Only recently, some plesiomorphic lineages have been split out as separate subfamilies, including the southern hemisphere Spilopyrinae and the ambiguously placed Synetinae. Here we provide insight into the internal systematics of the Eumolpinae based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of three ribosomal genes, including partial mitochondrial 16S and nuclear 28S and complete nuclear 18S rRNA gene sequences. Sixteen morphological characters considered important in the higher-level systematics of Eumolpinae were also included in a combined analysis with the molecular characters. All phylogenetic analyses were performed using parsimony by optimizing length variation directly on the tree, as implemented in the POY software. The data support the monophyly of the Spilopyrinae outside the clade including all sampled Eumolpinae, corroborating their treatment as a separate subfamily within the Chrysomelidae. The systematic placement of the Synetinae remains ambiguous but consistent with considering it a different subfamily as well, since the phylogenetic analyses using all the available evidence show the representative sequence of the subfamily also unrelated to the Eumolpinae. The Megascelini, traditionally considered a separate subfamily, falls within the Eumolpinae. Several recognized taxonomic groupings within Eumolpinae, including the tribes Adoxini or Typophorini, are not confirmed by molecular data; others like Eumolpini seem well supported. Among the morphological characters analyzed, the presence of a characteristic groove on the pygidium (a synapomorphy of the Eumolpini) and the shape of tarsal claws (simple, appendiculate or bifid) stand out as potentially useful characters for taxonomic classification in the Eumolpinae. SN - 1055-7903 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15683931/Molecular_systematics_of_Eumolpinae_and_the_relationships_with_Spilopyrinae__Coleoptera_Chrysomelidae__ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -