Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Comparison of muscle force production using the Smith machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises.
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb; 19(1):169-76.JS

Abstract

The Smith machine (SM) (vertical motion of bar on fixed path; fixed-form exercise) and free weights (FWs) (free-form path) are commonly used strength training modes. Exercisers may need to alternate between types of equipment, depending on testing, training, rehabilitation, and/or the exercisers' goals. The purposes of this study were to compare muscle force production for SM and FWs using a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the parallel back squat and supine bench press exercises and to predict the 1RM for one mode from 1RM on the other mode. Men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) alternately completed 1RM testing for squat and bench press using SM and FWs. Analyses of variance (type of equipment x sex) and linear regression models were calculated. A significant difference was found between bench press and squat 1RMs for each mode of equipment for all participants. The squat 1RM was greater for the SM than the FWs; conversely, the bench 1RM was greater for FWs than the SM. When sex was considered, bench 1RM for FWs was greater than SM for men and women. The squat 1RM was greater for SM than FWs for women only. The 1RM on one mode of equipment was the best predictor of 1RM for the other mode. For both sexes, the equation SM bench 1RM (in kilograms) = -6.76 + 0.95 (FW bench 1RM) can be used. For women only, SM squat 1RM (in kilograms) = 28.3 + 0.73 (FW squat 1RM). These findings provide equations for converting between SM and FW equipment for training.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Athletics, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa 50311, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Comparative Study
Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15705030

Citation

Cotterman, Michael L., et al. "Comparison of Muscle Force Production Using the Smith Machine and Free Weights for Bench Press and Squat Exercises." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 19, no. 1, 2005, pp. 169-76.
Cotterman ML, Darby LA, Skelly WA. Comparison of muscle force production using the Smith machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):169-76.
Cotterman, M. L., Darby, L. A., & Skelly, W. A. (2005). Comparison of muscle force production using the Smith machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 169-76.
Cotterman ML, Darby LA, Skelly WA. Comparison of Muscle Force Production Using the Smith Machine and Free Weights for Bench Press and Squat Exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):169-76. PubMed PMID: 15705030.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of muscle force production using the Smith machine and free weights for bench press and squat exercises. AU - Cotterman,Michael L, AU - Darby,Lynn A, AU - Skelly,William A, PY - 2005/2/12/pubmed PY - 2005/6/21/medline PY - 2005/2/12/entrez SP - 169 EP - 76 JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research JO - J Strength Cond Res VL - 19 IS - 1 N2 - The Smith machine (SM) (vertical motion of bar on fixed path; fixed-form exercise) and free weights (FWs) (free-form path) are commonly used strength training modes. Exercisers may need to alternate between types of equipment, depending on testing, training, rehabilitation, and/or the exercisers' goals. The purposes of this study were to compare muscle force production for SM and FWs using a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) for the parallel back squat and supine bench press exercises and to predict the 1RM for one mode from 1RM on the other mode. Men (n = 16) and women (n = 16) alternately completed 1RM testing for squat and bench press using SM and FWs. Analyses of variance (type of equipment x sex) and linear regression models were calculated. A significant difference was found between bench press and squat 1RMs for each mode of equipment for all participants. The squat 1RM was greater for the SM than the FWs; conversely, the bench 1RM was greater for FWs than the SM. When sex was considered, bench 1RM for FWs was greater than SM for men and women. The squat 1RM was greater for SM than FWs for women only. The 1RM on one mode of equipment was the best predictor of 1RM for the other mode. For both sexes, the equation SM bench 1RM (in kilograms) = -6.76 + 0.95 (FW bench 1RM) can be used. For women only, SM squat 1RM (in kilograms) = 28.3 + 0.73 (FW squat 1RM). These findings provide equations for converting between SM and FW equipment for training. SN - 1064-8011 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15705030/Comparison_of_muscle_force_production_using_the_Smith_machine_and_free_weights_for_bench_press_and_squat_exercises_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -