Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Reversibility of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer.
J Urol. 2005 Mar; 173(3):784-9.JU

Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined the duration of testosterone suppression and recovery in patients with prostate cancer treated with a hydrogel implant releasing the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist histrelin or treated with a depot GnRH agonist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) responses were monitored in 3 groups. Group 1 comprised 7 patients treated with histrelin implant, which is inserted into the arm of the patient while under local anesthesia, and suppresses LH and testosterone. Following implant removal antiandrogens (flutamide or bicalutamide) were administered. Group 2 comprised 8 patients treated with long-term depot GnRH super agonists which were later withheld and patients were given bicalutamide. Group 3 consisted of 7 patients treated with bicalutamide.

RESULTS

In group 1 LH and T were in the castration range while implants were in place. LH increased 1 to 6 weeks after implant removal followed by an increase in T. In 7 of 8 patients in group 2, LH, T and prostate specific antigen remained suppressed for 9 months. In 6 of 7 group 3 patients LH and T increased with a decrease in prostate specific antigen.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite continuous prolonged T suppression for up to 3 years due to histrelin implant, LH and T increased rapidly following implant removal, indicating that suppression is reversible. In view of the 9-month suppression of LH and T after the last depot GnRH injection in 7 of 8 patients, it is possible to space GnRH agonist administration at longer intervals. However, T must be monitored to determine that suppression is maintained.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Urology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, affiliated with the Faculty of Health Sciences Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel. hormones@netvision.net.ilNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15711270

Citation

Fridmans, Alon, et al. "Reversibility of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer." The Journal of Urology, vol. 173, no. 3, 2005, pp. 784-9.
Fridmans A, Chertin B, Koulikov D, et al. Reversibility of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2005;173(3):784-9.
Fridmans, A., Chertin, B., Koulikov, D., Lindenberg, T., Gelber, H., Leiter, C., Farkas, A., & Spitz, I. M. (2005). Reversibility of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer. The Journal of Urology, 173(3), 784-9.
Fridmans A, et al. Reversibility of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2005;173(3):784-9. PubMed PMID: 15711270.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Reversibility of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer. AU - Fridmans,Alon, AU - Chertin,Boris, AU - Koulikov,Dmitry, AU - Lindenberg,Tzina, AU - Gelber,Hadassa, AU - Leiter,Chavie, AU - Farkas,Amicur, AU - Spitz,Irving M, PY - 2005/2/16/pubmed PY - 2005/3/30/medline PY - 2005/2/16/entrez SP - 784 EP - 9 JF - The Journal of urology JO - J Urol VL - 173 IS - 3 N2 - PURPOSE: We determined the duration of testosterone suppression and recovery in patients with prostate cancer treated with a hydrogel implant releasing the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist histrelin or treated with a depot GnRH agonist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) responses were monitored in 3 groups. Group 1 comprised 7 patients treated with histrelin implant, which is inserted into the arm of the patient while under local anesthesia, and suppresses LH and testosterone. Following implant removal antiandrogens (flutamide or bicalutamide) were administered. Group 2 comprised 8 patients treated with long-term depot GnRH super agonists which were later withheld and patients were given bicalutamide. Group 3 consisted of 7 patients treated with bicalutamide. RESULTS: In group 1 LH and T were in the castration range while implants were in place. LH increased 1 to 6 weeks after implant removal followed by an increase in T. In 7 of 8 patients in group 2, LH, T and prostate specific antigen remained suppressed for 9 months. In 6 of 7 group 3 patients LH and T increased with a decrease in prostate specific antigen. CONCLUSIONS: Despite continuous prolonged T suppression for up to 3 years due to histrelin implant, LH and T increased rapidly following implant removal, indicating that suppression is reversible. In view of the 9-month suppression of LH and T after the last depot GnRH injection in 7 of 8 patients, it is possible to space GnRH agonist administration at longer intervals. However, T must be monitored to determine that suppression is maintained. SN - 0022-5347 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15711270/Reversibility_of_androgen_deprivation_therapy_in_patients_with_prostate_cancer_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -