Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, jejunostomy, duodenostomy in 120 patients].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jan 01; 43(1):18-20.ZW

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy in 120 patients, focusing on its technique and indications.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy from May 2001 to April 2004, including 75 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), 42 percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), 2 percutaneous endoscopic duodenostomy (PED), 1 direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ). All tubes established by traditional pull technique.

RESULTS

The average duration of PEG was (9 +/- 4) min, PEJ (17 +/- 6) min, DPEJ 20 min, and PED was 10 and 12 min for 2 patients, respectively. Success rate of the technique was 98.4% (120/122). Major complication rate was 0.8% (1/120), and minor complication rate was 7.5% (9/120). Clinical indications: PEG, PED and PEJ were applied for long-term enteral nutritional support in 88 patients, gastrointestinal decompression in 25 patients, and transfusing external drainage bile to gastrointestinal tract in 5 patients. Two radiation enteritis patients used PEG for gastrointestinal decompression preoperatively and long-term enteral nutritional support postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

PEG, PED PEJ and DPEJ are easily handled, effective and safe, and may be widely used in clinical practice.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Research Institute of General Surgery, General Hospital of Nanjing Military Area, Nanjing 210002, China. surgery34@163.comNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

English Abstract
Journal Article

Language

chi

PubMed ID

15774167

Citation

Jiang, Zhi-wei, et al. "[Clinical Experience of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Jejunostomy, Duodenostomy in 120 Patients]." Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery], vol. 43, no. 1, 2005, pp. 18-20.
Jiang ZW, Wang ZM, Li JS, et al. [Clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, jejunostomy, duodenostomy in 120 patients]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005;43(1):18-20.
Jiang, Z. W., Wang, Z. M., Li, J. S., Li, N., Wu, S. M., Ding, K., Liu, B. Z., Huang, Q., Li, Q., Jia, Y. H., & Zhou, W. (2005). [Clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, jejunostomy, duodenostomy in 120 patients]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi [Chinese Journal of Surgery], 43(1), 18-20.
Jiang ZW, et al. [Clinical Experience of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Jejunostomy, Duodenostomy in 120 Patients]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jan 1;43(1):18-20. PubMed PMID: 15774167.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, jejunostomy, duodenostomy in 120 patients]. AU - Jiang,Zhi-wei, AU - Wang,Zhi-ming, AU - Li,Jie-shou, AU - Li,Ning, AU - Wu,Su-mei, AU - Ding,Kai, AU - Liu,Bi-zhu, AU - Huang,Qi, AU - Li,Qiang, AU - Jia,Yun-he, AU - Zhou,Wei, PY - 2005/3/19/pubmed PY - 2005/9/30/medline PY - 2005/3/19/entrez SP - 18 EP - 20 JF - Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery] JO - Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi VL - 43 IS - 1 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To report clinical experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy in 120 patients, focusing on its technique and indications. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients received percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, duodenostomy, jejunostomy from May 2001 to April 2004, including 75 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), 42 percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), 2 percutaneous endoscopic duodenostomy (PED), 1 direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ). All tubes established by traditional pull technique. RESULTS: The average duration of PEG was (9 +/- 4) min, PEJ (17 +/- 6) min, DPEJ 20 min, and PED was 10 and 12 min for 2 patients, respectively. Success rate of the technique was 98.4% (120/122). Major complication rate was 0.8% (1/120), and minor complication rate was 7.5% (9/120). Clinical indications: PEG, PED and PEJ were applied for long-term enteral nutritional support in 88 patients, gastrointestinal decompression in 25 patients, and transfusing external drainage bile to gastrointestinal tract in 5 patients. Two radiation enteritis patients used PEG for gastrointestinal decompression preoperatively and long-term enteral nutritional support postoperatively. CONCLUSION: PEG, PED PEJ and DPEJ are easily handled, effective and safe, and may be widely used in clinical practice. SN - 0529-5815 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15774167/[Clinical_experience_of_percutaneous_endoscopic_gastrostomy_jejunostomy_duodenostomy_in_120_patients]_ L2 - http://journal.yiigle.com/LinkIn.do?linkin_type=pubmed&issn=0529-5815&year=2005&vol=43&issue=1&fpage=18 DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -