Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Support torques during simulated sit-to-stand movements.
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2005; 41:7-12.BS

Abstract

Sit-to-stand movements are a fundamental daily activity and a prerequisite to upright posture. Previous simulations of spinal cord injured individuals using functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) suggested a forward foot placement would reduce hand-support forces. However, this recommendation has proved to be difficult for able-bodied individuals standing hands-free and for individuals with spinal cord injuries standing with a walker. This inverse model is a step towards the goal of using forward simulations to determine efficient sit-to-stand strategies. Initial seated postures varied from 80-110 degrees of knee flexion and 90-120 degrees of hip flexion. Realistic progressions of lower extremity joint angles including development of linear momentum were created using sigmoid functions. These kinematic values were used to estimate the required resultant joint torques to complete sit-to-stand. Joint torque values that act to raise the body were combined to indicate sit-to-stand difficulty from different seated postures. A representative foot-forward placement (knee 80 degrees, hip 90 degrees) resulted in a maximum combined torque of 544 Nm. In contrast, a representative foot-back placement (knee 110 degrees, hip 120 degrees) resulted in a maximum combined torque of 661 Nm. An intermediate seated posture (knee 97 degrees, hip 90 degrees) produced the lowest maximum combined torque of 401 Nm (2 Nm ankle plantarflexion, 201 Nm knee extension, 198 Nm hip extension). Foot-forward placement required substantial ankle dorsiflexion torques. The most efficient strategy appeared to be combining a foot back placement with momentum generation using hip flexion. By generalizing the sit-to-stand model beyond FNS-driven movements, further insight may be gained into other populations (i.e., elderly).

Authors+Show Affiliations

Department of Health and Human Performance, Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011-1160, USA.No affiliation info availableNo affiliation info availableNo affiliation info available

Pub Type(s)

Journal Article

Language

eng

PubMed ID

15850074

Citation

Gillette, Jason C., et al. "Support Torques During Simulated Sit-to-stand Movements." Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, vol. 41, 2005, pp. 7-12.
Gillette JC, Stevermer CA, Raina S, et al. Support torques during simulated sit-to-stand movements. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2005;41:7-12.
Gillette, J. C., Stevermer, C. A., Raina, S., & Derrick, T. R. (2005). Support torques during simulated sit-to-stand movements. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 41, 7-12.
Gillette JC, et al. Support Torques During Simulated Sit-to-stand Movements. Biomed Sci Instrum. 2005;41:7-12. PubMed PMID: 15850074.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - Support torques during simulated sit-to-stand movements. AU - Gillette,Jason C, AU - Stevermer,Catherine A, AU - Raina,Shashank, AU - Derrick,Timothy R, PY - 2005/4/27/pubmed PY - 2005/5/26/medline PY - 2005/4/27/entrez SP - 7 EP - 12 JF - Biomedical sciences instrumentation JO - Biomed Sci Instrum VL - 41 N2 - Sit-to-stand movements are a fundamental daily activity and a prerequisite to upright posture. Previous simulations of spinal cord injured individuals using functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) suggested a forward foot placement would reduce hand-support forces. However, this recommendation has proved to be difficult for able-bodied individuals standing hands-free and for individuals with spinal cord injuries standing with a walker. This inverse model is a step towards the goal of using forward simulations to determine efficient sit-to-stand strategies. Initial seated postures varied from 80-110 degrees of knee flexion and 90-120 degrees of hip flexion. Realistic progressions of lower extremity joint angles including development of linear momentum were created using sigmoid functions. These kinematic values were used to estimate the required resultant joint torques to complete sit-to-stand. Joint torque values that act to raise the body were combined to indicate sit-to-stand difficulty from different seated postures. A representative foot-forward placement (knee 80 degrees, hip 90 degrees) resulted in a maximum combined torque of 544 Nm. In contrast, a representative foot-back placement (knee 110 degrees, hip 120 degrees) resulted in a maximum combined torque of 661 Nm. An intermediate seated posture (knee 97 degrees, hip 90 degrees) produced the lowest maximum combined torque of 401 Nm (2 Nm ankle plantarflexion, 201 Nm knee extension, 198 Nm hip extension). Foot-forward placement required substantial ankle dorsiflexion torques. The most efficient strategy appeared to be combining a foot back placement with momentum generation using hip flexion. By generalizing the sit-to-stand model beyond FNS-driven movements, further insight may be gained into other populations (i.e., elderly). SN - 0067-8856 UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/15850074/Support_torques_during_simulated_sit_to_stand_movements_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -