Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

[Influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor].
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jun; 40(6):365-8.ZF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) and epidural analgesia (EA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on labor progress.

METHODS

The partograms of 722 healthy vaginal delivery nulliparas were retrospectively analyzed in Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, First Hospital of Peking University. Three groups were divided among all subjects: CSEA group (259 cases) receiving CSEA + PCEA, EA group (215 cases) receiving EA + PCEA and control group (248 cases) without any analgesia method.

RESULTS

The duration of active phase in the first stage and the second stage in the CSEA group [(272 +/- 127) min and (57 +/- 36) min] and in the EA group [(305 +/- 133) min and (59 +/- 39) min] were significantly longer than that of control group [(188 +/- 110) min and (45 +/- 32) min]. No significant difference was found in the three groups in the duration of the third stage [CSEA: (9 +/- 6) min; EA: (8 +/- 6) min;

CONTROL

(9 +/- 6) min. P > 0.05]. The dilatation curve of the cervix in CSEA group and EA group was plotted on the right side of the Friedman curve while that of the control group on the left, reflecting a slower progress in the former two groups than the control during the active phase. The average speed of cervical dilatation in CSEA and EA groups (1.5 cm and 1.4 cm) was significantly slower than that of the control (1.8 cm) in the active phase (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CSEA + PCEA or EA + PCEA during labor might slow down the progress of the active phase and lead to a prolonged labor in the end. Therefore, the management of these parturients may vary based on Friedman partogram.

Authors+Show Affiliations

Zhang M
Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, First Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100034, China.
Yang HX
No affiliation info available
Li HY
No affiliation info available
Shi HX
No affiliation info available
Qu Y
No affiliation info available

MeSH

AdultAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesicsAnesthesia, SpinalFemaleHumansLabor PainLabor, ObstetricPregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Pub Type(s)

English Abstract
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Language

chi

PubMed ID

16008883

Citation

Zhang, Miao, et al. "[Influence of Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia and Epidural Analgesia On the Progress of Labor]." Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, vol. 40, no. 6, 2005, pp. 365-8.
Zhang M, Yang HX, Li HY, et al. [Influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005;40(6):365-8.
Zhang, M., Yang, H. X., Li, H. Y., Shi, H. X., & Qu, Y. (2005). [Influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi, 40(6), 365-8.
Zhang M, et al. [Influence of Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia and Epidural Analgesia On the Progress of Labor]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005;40(6):365-8. PubMed PMID: 16008883.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - JOUR T1 - [Influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia and epidural analgesia on the progress of labor]. AU - Zhang,Miao, AU - Yang,Hui-xia, AU - Li,Hai-yan, AU - Shi,Hui-xing, AU - Qu,Yuan, PY - 2005/7/13/pubmed PY - 2010/6/4/medline PY - 2005/7/13/entrez SP - 365 EP - 8 JF - Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi JO - Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi VL - 40 IS - 6 N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) and epidural analgesia (EA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on labor progress. METHODS: The partograms of 722 healthy vaginal delivery nulliparas were retrospectively analyzed in Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, First Hospital of Peking University. Three groups were divided among all subjects: CSEA group (259 cases) receiving CSEA + PCEA, EA group (215 cases) receiving EA + PCEA and control group (248 cases) without any analgesia method. RESULTS: The duration of active phase in the first stage and the second stage in the CSEA group [(272 +/- 127) min and (57 +/- 36) min] and in the EA group [(305 +/- 133) min and (59 +/- 39) min] were significantly longer than that of control group [(188 +/- 110) min and (45 +/- 32) min]. No significant difference was found in the three groups in the duration of the third stage [CSEA: (9 +/- 6) min; EA: (8 +/- 6) min; CONTROL: (9 +/- 6) min. P > 0.05]. The dilatation curve of the cervix in CSEA group and EA group was plotted on the right side of the Friedman curve while that of the control group on the left, reflecting a slower progress in the former two groups than the control during the active phase. The average speed of cervical dilatation in CSEA and EA groups (1.5 cm and 1.4 cm) was significantly slower than that of the control (1.8 cm) in the active phase (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CSEA + PCEA or EA + PCEA during labor might slow down the progress of the active phase and lead to a prolonged labor in the end. Therefore, the management of these parturients may vary based on Friedman partogram. SN - 0529-567X UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16008883/[Influence_of_combined_spinal_epidural_analgesia_and_epidural_analgesia_on_the_progress_of_labor]_ DB - PRIME DP - Unbound Medicine ER -