Abstract
PURPOSE
To report canalicular stenosis as a side effect of the new antineoplastic agent S-1.
DESIGN
Interventional case series.
METHODS
Three patients who received S-1 for treatment of gastrointestinal cancer at a tertiary cancer center were evaluated and treated for epiphora.
RESULTS
Two patients were found to have severe canalicular stenosis and nasolacrimal duct blockage after approximately 6 months of S-1 therapy. One patient underwent dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tube placement on one side and dacryocystorhinostomy and Pyrex glass tube placement on the other side. The other patient declined a surgical intervention. One additional patient with epiphora had punctal stenosis early in the course of S-1 therapy. His epiphora resolved after probing and irrigation and 4 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Canalicular and nasolacrimal duct blockage is a previously unreported side effect of S-1 and should be recognized and treated at its earliest possible stage so that complete closure of the canaliculi can be avoided.
TY - JOUR
T1 - Canalicular and nasolacrimal duct blockage: an ocular side effect associated with the antineoplastic drug S-1.
AU - Esmaeli,Bita,
AU - Golio,Dominick,
AU - Lubecki,Linda,
AU - Ajani,Jaffer,
PY - 2004/12/10/received
PY - 2005/01/26/revised
PY - 2005/01/29/accepted
PY - 2005/8/10/pubmed
PY - 2005/9/1/medline
PY - 2005/8/10/entrez
SP - 325
EP - 7
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
JO - Am J Ophthalmol
VL - 140
IS - 2
N2 - PURPOSE: To report canalicular stenosis as a side effect of the new antineoplastic agent S-1. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: Three patients who received S-1 for treatment of gastrointestinal cancer at a tertiary cancer center were evaluated and treated for epiphora. RESULTS: Two patients were found to have severe canalicular stenosis and nasolacrimal duct blockage after approximately 6 months of S-1 therapy. One patient underwent dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tube placement on one side and dacryocystorhinostomy and Pyrex glass tube placement on the other side. The other patient declined a surgical intervention. One additional patient with epiphora had punctal stenosis early in the course of S-1 therapy. His epiphora resolved after probing and irrigation and 4 weeks of topical corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Canalicular and nasolacrimal duct blockage is a previously unreported side effect of S-1 and should be recognized and treated at its earliest possible stage so that complete closure of the canaliculi can be avoided.
SN - 0002-9394
UR - https://www.unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/16086962/Canalicular_and_nasolacrimal_duct_blockage:_an_ocular_side_effect_associated_with_the_antineoplastic_drug_S_1_
L2 - https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002-9394(05)00152-2
DB - PRIME
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -